All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, rookxu <brookxu.cn@gmail.com>,
	Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 7/8] ext4: Use rbtrees to manage PAs instead of inode i_prealloc_list
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 13:32:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230116080216.249195-8-ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230116080216.249195-1-ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>

Currently, the kernel uses i_prealloc_list to hold all the inode
preallocations. This is known to cause degradation in performance in
workloads which perform large number of sparse writes on a single file.
This is mainly because functions like ext4_mb_normalize_request() and
ext4_mb_use_preallocated() iterate over this complete list, resulting in
slowdowns when large number of PAs are present.

Patch 27bc446e2 partially fixed this by enforcing a limit of 512 for
the inode preallocation list and adding logic to continually trim the
list if it grows above the threshold, however our testing revealed that
a hardcoded value is not suitable for all kinds of workloads.

To optimize this, add an rbtree to the inode and hold the inode
preallocations in this rbtree. This will make iterating over inode PAs
faster and scale much better than a linked list. Additionally, we also
had to remove the LRU logic that was added during trimming of the list
(in ext4_mb_release_context()) as it will add extra overhead in rbtree.
The discards now happen in the lowest-logical-offset-first order.

** Locking notes **

With the introduction of rbtree to maintain inode PAs, we can't use RCU
to walk the tree for searching since it can result in partial traversals
which might miss some nodes(or entire subtrees) while discards happen
in parallel (which happens under a lock).  Hence this patch converts the
ei->i_prealloc_lock spin_lock to rw_lock.

Almost all the codepaths that read/modify the PA rbtrees are protected
by the higher level inode->i_data_sem (except
ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations() and ext4_clear_inode()) IIUC, the
only place we need lock protection is when one thread is reading
"searching" the PA rbtree (earlier protected under rcu_read_lock()) and
another is "deleting" the PAs in ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations()
function (which iterates all the PAs using the grp->bb_prealloc_list and
deletes PAs from the tree without taking any inode lock (i_data_sem)).

So, this patch converts all rcu_read_lock/unlock() paths for inode list
PA to use read_lock() and all places where we were using
ei->i_prealloc_lock spinlock will now be using write_lock().

Note that this makes the fast path (searching of the right PA e.g.
ext4_mb_use_preallocated() or ext4_mb_normalize_request()), now use
read_lock() instead of rcu_read_lock/unlock().  Ths also will now block
due to slow discard path (ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations()) which
uses write_lock().

But this is not as bad as it looks. This is because -

1. The slow path only occurs when the normal allocation failed and we
   can say that we are low on disk space.  One can argue this scenario
   won't be much frequent.

2. ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations(), locks and unlocks the rwlock
   for deleting every individual PA.  This gives enough opportunity for
   the fast path to acquire the read_lock for searching the PA inode
   list.

** Design changes around deleted PAs **

In ext4_mb_adjust_overlap(), it is possible for an allocating thread to
come across a PA that is marked deleted via
ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations() but not yet removed from the
inode PA rbtree. In such a case, we ignore any overlaps with this PA
node and simply move forward in the rbtree by comparing logical start of
to-be-inserted PA and the deleted PA node.

Although this usually doesn't cause an issue and we can move forward in
the tree, in one speacial case, i.e if range of deleted PA lies
completely inside the normalized range, we might require to travese both
the sub-trees under such a deleted PA.

To simplify this special scenario and also as an optimization, undelete
the PA If the allocating thread determines that this PA might be needed
in the near future. This results in the following changes:

- ext4_mb_use_preallocated(): Use a deleted PA if original request lies in it.
- ext4_mb_pa_adjust_overlap(): Undelete a PA if it is deleted but there
		is an overlap with the normalized range.
- ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations(): Rollback delete operation if
		allocation path undeletes a PA before it is erased from inode PA
		list.

Since this covers the special case we discussed above, we will always
un-delete the PA when we encounter the special case and we can then
adjust for overlap and traverse the PA rbtree without any issues.

Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
---
 fs/ext4/ext4.h    |   4 +-
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 239 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 fs/ext4/mballoc.h |   6 +-
 fs/ext4/super.c   |   4 +-
 4 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 140e1eb300d1..fad5f087e4c6 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -1120,8 +1120,8 @@ struct ext4_inode_info {
 
 	/* mballoc */
 	atomic_t i_prealloc_active;
-	struct list_head i_prealloc_list;
-	spinlock_t i_prealloc_lock;
+	struct rb_root i_prealloc_node;
+	rwlock_t i_prealloc_lock;
 
 	/* extents status tree */
 	struct ext4_es_tree i_es_tree;
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 53c4efd34d1c..85598079b7ce 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3984,6 +3984,44 @@ static void ext4_mb_normalize_group_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 	mb_debug(sb, "goal %u blocks for locality group\n", ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len);
 }
 
+static void ext4_mb_mark_pa_inuse(struct super_block *sb,
+				    struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa)
+{
+	struct ext4_inode_info *ei;
+
+	if (pa->pa_deleted == 0) {
+		ext4_warning(
+			sb, "pa already inuse, type:%d, pblk:%llu, lblk:%u, len:%d\n",
+			pa->pa_type, pa->pa_pstart, pa->pa_lstart, pa->pa_len);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	pa->pa_deleted = 0;
+
+	if (pa->pa_type == MB_INODE_PA) {
+		ei = EXT4_I(pa->pa_inode);
+		atomic_inc(&ei->i_prealloc_active);
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function returns the next element to look at during inode
+ * PA rbtree walk. We assume that we have held the inode PA rbtree lock
+ * (ei->i_prealloc_lock)
+ *
+ * new_start	The start of the range we want to compare
+ * cur_start	The existing start that we are comparing against
+ * node	The node of the rb_tree
+ */
+static inline struct rb_node*
+ext4_mb_pa_rb_next_iter(ext4_lblk_t new_start, ext4_lblk_t cur_start, struct rb_node *node)
+{
+	if (new_start < cur_start)
+		return node->rb_left;
+	else
+		return node->rb_right;
+}
+
 static inline void
 ext4_mb_pa_assert_overlap(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 			  ext4_lblk_t start, ext4_lblk_t end)
@@ -3992,27 +4030,31 @@ ext4_mb_pa_assert_overlap(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 	struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode);
 	struct ext4_prealloc_space *tmp_pa;
 	ext4_lblk_t tmp_pa_start, tmp_pa_end;
+	struct rb_node *iter;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp_pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_node.inode_list) {
-		spin_lock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
-		if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted == 0) {
-			tmp_pa_start = tmp_pa->pa_lstart;
-			tmp_pa_end = tmp_pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(sbi, tmp_pa->pa_len);
+	read_lock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
+	iter = ei->i_prealloc_node.rb_node;
+	while (iter) {
+		tmp_pa = rb_entry(iter, struct ext4_prealloc_space,
+				  pa_node.inode_node);
+		tmp_pa_start = tmp_pa->pa_lstart;
+		tmp_pa_end = tmp_pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(sbi, tmp_pa->pa_len);
 
+		spin_lock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
+		if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted == 0)
 			BUG_ON(!(start >= tmp_pa_end || end <= tmp_pa_start));
-		}
 		spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
+
+		iter = ext4_mb_pa_rb_next_iter(start, tmp_pa_start, iter);
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+	read_unlock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
 }
-
 /*
  * Given an allocation context "ac" and a range "start", "end", check
  * and adjust boundaries if the range overlaps with any of the existing
  * preallocatoins stored in the corresponding inode of the allocation context.
  *
- *Parameters:
+ * Parameters:
  *	ac			allocation context
  *	start			start of the new range
  *	end			end of the new range
@@ -4024,6 +4066,7 @@ ext4_mb_pa_adjust_overlap(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 	struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode);
 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
 	struct ext4_prealloc_space *tmp_pa;
+	struct rb_node *iter;
 	ext4_lblk_t new_start, new_end;
 	ext4_lblk_t tmp_pa_start, tmp_pa_end;
 
@@ -4031,25 +4074,40 @@ ext4_mb_pa_adjust_overlap(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 	new_end = *end;
 
 	/* check we don't cross already preallocated blocks */
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp_pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_node.inode_list) {
-		if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted)
-			continue;
-		spin_lock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
-		if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted) {
-			spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
-			continue;
-		}
+	read_lock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
+	for (iter = ei->i_prealloc_node.rb_node; iter;
+	     iter = ext4_mb_pa_rb_next_iter(new_start, tmp_pa_start, iter)) {
+		int is_overlap;
 
+		tmp_pa = rb_entry(iter, struct ext4_prealloc_space,
+				  pa_node.inode_node);
 		tmp_pa_start = tmp_pa->pa_lstart;
 		tmp_pa_end = tmp_pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(sbi, tmp_pa->pa_len);
+		is_overlap = !(tmp_pa_start >= new_end || tmp_pa_end <= new_start);
+
+		spin_lock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
+		if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted) {
+			if (is_overlap) {
+				/*
+				 * Normalized range overlaps with range of this
+				 * deleted PA, that means we might need it in
+				 * near future. Since the PA is yet to be
+				 * removed from inode PA tree and freed, lets
+				 * just undelete it.
+				 */
+				ext4_mb_mark_pa_inuse(ac->ac_sb, tmp_pa);
+			} else {
+				spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
+				continue;
+			}
+		}
 
 		/* PA must not overlap original request */
 		BUG_ON(!(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >= tmp_pa_end ||
 			ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical < tmp_pa_start));
 
 		/* skip PAs this normalized request doesn't overlap with */
-		if (tmp_pa_start >= new_end || tmp_pa_end <= new_start) {
+		if (!is_overlap) {
 			spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -4065,7 +4123,7 @@ ext4_mb_pa_adjust_overlap(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 		}
 		spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+	read_unlock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
 
 	/* XXX: extra loop to check we really don't overlap preallocations */
 	ext4_mb_pa_assert_overlap(ac, new_start, new_end);
@@ -4192,7 +4250,6 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 	ext4_mb_pa_adjust_overlap(ac, &start, &end);
 
 	size = end - start;
-
 	/*
 	 * In this function "start" and "size" are normalized for better
 	 * alignment and length such that we could preallocate more blocks.
@@ -4401,6 +4458,7 @@ ext4_mb_use_preallocated(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 	struct ext4_locality_group *lg;
 	struct ext4_prealloc_space *tmp_pa, *cpa = NULL;
 	ext4_lblk_t tmp_pa_start, tmp_pa_end;
+	struct rb_node *iter;
 	ext4_fsblk_t goal_block;
 
 	/* only data can be preallocated */
@@ -4408,14 +4466,17 @@ ext4_mb_use_preallocated(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 		return false;
 
 	/* first, try per-file preallocation */
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp_pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_node.inode_list) {
+	read_lock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
+	for (iter = ei->i_prealloc_node.rb_node; iter;
+	     iter = ext4_mb_pa_rb_next_iter(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical, tmp_pa_start, iter)) {
+		tmp_pa = rb_entry(iter, struct ext4_prealloc_space, pa_node.inode_node);
 
 		/* all fields in this condition don't change,
 		 * so we can skip locking for them */
 		tmp_pa_start = tmp_pa->pa_lstart;
 		tmp_pa_end = tmp_pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(sbi, tmp_pa->pa_len);
 
+		/* original request start doesn't lie in this PA */
 		if (ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical < tmp_pa_start ||
 		    ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >= tmp_pa_end)
 			continue;
@@ -4433,17 +4494,25 @@ ext4_mb_use_preallocated(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 
 		/* found preallocated blocks, use them */
 		spin_lock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
-		if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted == 0 && tmp_pa->pa_free) {
+		if (tmp_pa->pa_free) {
+			if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted == 1) {
+				/*
+				 * Since PA is yet to be deleted from inode PA
+				 * rbtree, just undelete it and use it.
+				 */
+				ext4_mb_mark_pa_inuse(ac->ac_sb, tmp_pa);
+			}
+
 			atomic_inc(&tmp_pa->pa_count);
 			ext4_mb_use_inode_pa(ac, tmp_pa);
 			spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
 			ac->ac_criteria = 10;
-			rcu_read_unlock();
+			read_unlock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
 			return true;
 		}
 		spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+	read_unlock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
 
 	/* can we use group allocation? */
 	if (!(ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_HINT_GROUP_ALLOC))
@@ -4596,6 +4665,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_put_pa(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 {
 	ext4_group_t grp;
 	ext4_fsblk_t grp_blk;
+	struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode);
 
 	/* in this short window concurrent discard can set pa_deleted */
 	spin_lock(&pa->pa_lock);
@@ -4641,16 +4711,41 @@ static void ext4_mb_put_pa(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 	ext4_unlock_group(sb, grp);
 
 	if (pa->pa_type == MB_INODE_PA) {
-		spin_lock(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock);
-		list_del_rcu(&pa->pa_node.inode_list);
-		spin_unlock(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock);
+		write_lock(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock);
+		rb_erase(&pa->pa_node.inode_node, &ei->i_prealloc_node);
+		write_unlock(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock);
+		ext4_mb_pa_free(pa);
 	} else {
 		spin_lock(pa->pa_node_lock.lg_lock);
 		list_del_rcu(&pa->pa_node.lg_list);
 		spin_unlock(pa->pa_node_lock.lg_lock);
+		call_rcu(&(pa)->u.pa_rcu, ext4_mb_pa_callback);
 	}
+}
 
-	call_rcu(&(pa)->u.pa_rcu, ext4_mb_pa_callback);
+static void ext4_mb_pa_rb_insert(struct rb_root *root, struct rb_node *new)
+{
+	struct rb_node **iter = &root->rb_node, *parent = NULL;
+	struct ext4_prealloc_space *iter_pa, *new_pa;
+	ext4_lblk_t iter_start, new_start;
+
+	while (*iter) {
+		iter_pa = rb_entry(*iter, struct ext4_prealloc_space,
+				   pa_node.inode_node);
+		new_pa = rb_entry(new, struct ext4_prealloc_space,
+				   pa_node.inode_node);
+		iter_start = iter_pa->pa_lstart;
+		new_start = new_pa->pa_lstart;
+
+		parent = *iter;
+		if (new_start < iter_start)
+			iter = &((*iter)->rb_left);
+		else
+			iter = &((*iter)->rb_right);
+	}
+
+	rb_link_node(new, parent, iter);
+	rb_insert_color(new, root);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -4716,7 +4811,6 @@ ext4_mb_new_inode_pa(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 	pa->pa_len = ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len;
 	pa->pa_free = pa->pa_len;
 	spin_lock_init(&pa->pa_lock);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pa->pa_node.inode_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pa->pa_group_list);
 	pa->pa_deleted = 0;
 	pa->pa_type = MB_INODE_PA;
@@ -4736,9 +4830,9 @@ ext4_mb_new_inode_pa(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 
 	list_add(&pa->pa_group_list, &grp->bb_prealloc_list);
 
-	spin_lock(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock);
-	list_add_rcu(&pa->pa_node.inode_list, &ei->i_prealloc_list);
-	spin_unlock(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock);
+	write_lock(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock);
+	ext4_mb_pa_rb_insert(&ei->i_prealloc_node, &pa->pa_node.inode_node);
+	write_unlock(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock);
 	atomic_inc(&ei->i_prealloc_active);
 }
 
@@ -4904,6 +4998,7 @@ ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations(struct super_block *sb,
 	struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa, *tmp;
 	struct list_head list;
 	struct ext4_buddy e4b;
+	struct ext4_inode_info *ei;
 	int err;
 	int free = 0;
 
@@ -4967,18 +5062,45 @@ ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations(struct super_block *sb,
 			list_del_rcu(&pa->pa_node.lg_list);
 			spin_unlock(pa->pa_node_lock.lg_lock);
 		} else {
-			spin_lock(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock);
-			list_del_rcu(&pa->pa_node.inode_list);
-			spin_unlock(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock);
+			/*
+			 * The allocation path might undelete a PA
+			 * incase it expects it to be used again in near
+			 * future. In that case, rollback the ongoing delete
+			 * operation and don't remove the PA from inode PA
+			 * tree.
+			 *
+			 * TODO: See if we need pa_lock since there might no
+			 * path that contends with it once the rbtree writelock
+			 * is taken.
+			 */
+			write_lock(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock);
+			spin_lock(&pa->pa_lock);
+			if (pa->pa_deleted == 0) {
+				free -= pa->pa_free;
+				list_add(&pa->pa_group_list,
+					 &grp->bb_prealloc_list);
+				list_del(&pa->u.pa_tmp_list);
+
+				spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
+				write_unlock(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock);
+				continue;
+			}
+			spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
+
+			ei = EXT4_I(pa->pa_inode);
+			rb_erase(&pa->pa_node.inode_node, &ei->i_prealloc_node);
+			write_unlock(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock);
 		}
 
-		if (pa->pa_type == MB_GROUP_PA)
+		list_del(&pa->u.pa_tmp_list);
+
+		if (pa->pa_type == MB_GROUP_PA) {
 			ext4_mb_release_group_pa(&e4b, pa);
-		else
+			call_rcu(&(pa)->u.pa_rcu, ext4_mb_pa_callback);
+		} else {
 			ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(&e4b, bitmap_bh, pa);
-
-		list_del(&pa->u.pa_tmp_list);
-		call_rcu(&(pa)->u.pa_rcu, ext4_mb_pa_callback);
+			ext4_mb_pa_free(pa);
+		}
 	}
 
 	ext4_unlock_group(sb, group);
@@ -5008,6 +5130,7 @@ void ext4_discard_preallocations(struct inode *inode, unsigned int needed)
 	ext4_group_t group = 0;
 	struct list_head list;
 	struct ext4_buddy e4b;
+	struct rb_node *iter;
 	int err;
 
 	if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
@@ -5030,17 +5153,18 @@ void ext4_discard_preallocations(struct inode *inode, unsigned int needed)
 
 repeat:
 	/* first, collect all pa's in the inode */
-	spin_lock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
-	while (!list_empty(&ei->i_prealloc_list) && needed) {
-		pa = list_entry(ei->i_prealloc_list.prev,
-				struct ext4_prealloc_space, pa_node.inode_list);
+	write_lock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
+	for (iter = rb_first(&ei->i_prealloc_node); iter && needed; iter = rb_next(iter)) {
+		pa = rb_entry(iter, struct ext4_prealloc_space,
+				pa_node.inode_node);
 		BUG_ON(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock != &ei->i_prealloc_lock);
+
 		spin_lock(&pa->pa_lock);
 		if (atomic_read(&pa->pa_count)) {
 			/* this shouldn't happen often - nobody should
 			 * use preallocation while we're discarding it */
 			spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
-			spin_unlock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
+			write_unlock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
 			ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
 				 "uh-oh! used pa while discarding");
 			WARN_ON(1);
@@ -5051,7 +5175,7 @@ void ext4_discard_preallocations(struct inode *inode, unsigned int needed)
 		if (pa->pa_deleted == 0) {
 			ext4_mb_mark_pa_deleted(sb, pa);
 			spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
-			list_del_rcu(&pa->pa_node.inode_list);
+			rb_erase(&pa->pa_node.inode_node, &ei->i_prealloc_node);
 			list_add(&pa->u.pa_tmp_list, &list);
 			needed--;
 			continue;
@@ -5059,7 +5183,7 @@ void ext4_discard_preallocations(struct inode *inode, unsigned int needed)
 
 		/* someone is deleting pa right now */
 		spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
-		spin_unlock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
+		write_unlock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
 
 		/* we have to wait here because pa_deleted
 		 * doesn't mean pa is already unlinked from
@@ -5076,7 +5200,7 @@ void ext4_discard_preallocations(struct inode *inode, unsigned int needed)
 		schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ);
 		goto repeat;
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
+	write_unlock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(pa, tmp, &list, u.pa_tmp_list) {
 		BUG_ON(pa->pa_type != MB_INODE_PA);
@@ -5108,7 +5232,7 @@ void ext4_discard_preallocations(struct inode *inode, unsigned int needed)
 		put_bh(bitmap_bh);
 
 		list_del(&pa->u.pa_tmp_list);
-		call_rcu(&(pa)->u.pa_rcu, ext4_mb_pa_callback);
+		ext4_mb_pa_free(pa);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -5482,7 +5606,6 @@ static void ext4_mb_trim_inode_pa(struct inode *inode)
 static int ext4_mb_release_context(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = ac->ac_inode;
-	struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
 	struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa = ac->ac_pa;
 	if (pa) {
@@ -5509,16 +5632,6 @@ static int ext4_mb_release_context(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 			}
 		}
 
-		if (pa->pa_type == MB_INODE_PA) {
-			/*
-			 * treat per-inode prealloc list as a lru list, then try
-			 * to trim the least recently used PA.
-			 */
-			spin_lock(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock);
-			list_move(&pa->pa_node.inode_list, &ei->i_prealloc_list);
-			spin_unlock(pa->pa_node_lock.inode_lock);
-		}
-
 		ext4_mb_put_pa(ac, ac->ac_sb, pa);
 	}
 	if (ac->ac_bitmap_page)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
index 398a6688c341..f8e8ee493867 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ struct ext4_free_data {
 
 struct ext4_prealloc_space {
 	union {
-		struct list_head	inode_list; /* for inode PAs */
+		struct rb_node	inode_node;		/* for inode PA rbtree */
 		struct list_head	lg_list;	/* for lg PAs */
 	} pa_node;
 	struct list_head	pa_group_list;
@@ -132,10 +132,10 @@ struct ext4_prealloc_space {
 	ext4_grpblk_t		pa_free;	/* how many blocks are free */
 	unsigned short		pa_type;	/* pa type. inode or group */
 	union {
-		spinlock_t		*inode_lock;	/* locks the inode list holding this PA */
+		rwlock_t		*inode_lock;	/* locks the rbtree holding this PA */
 		spinlock_t		*lg_lock;	/* locks the lg list holding this PA */
 	} pa_node_lock;
-	struct inode		*pa_inode;	/* hack, for history only */
+	struct inode		*pa_inode;	/* used to get the inode during group discard */
 };
 
 enum {
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 72ead3b56706..5fb3e401de6b 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -1325,9 +1325,9 @@ static struct inode *ext4_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
 	inode_set_iversion(&ei->vfs_inode, 1);
 	ei->i_flags = 0;
 	spin_lock_init(&ei->i_raw_lock);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->i_prealloc_list);
+	ei->i_prealloc_node = RB_ROOT;
 	atomic_set(&ei->i_prealloc_active, 0);
-	spin_lock_init(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
+	rwlock_init(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
 	ext4_es_init_tree(&ei->i_es_tree);
 	rwlock_init(&ei->i_es_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->i_es_list);
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-16  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-16  8:02 [PATCH v3 0/8] ext4: Convert inode preallocation list to an rbtree Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16  8:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ext4: Stop searching if PA doesn't satisfy non-extent file Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16  8:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] ext4: Refactor code related to freeing PAs Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16  8:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] ext4: Refactor code in ext4_mb_normalize_request() and ext4_mb_use_preallocated() Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16  8:02 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] ext4: Move overlap assert logic into a separate function Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16  8:02 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] ext4: Abstract out overlap fix/check logic in ext4_mb_normalize_request() Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16  8:02 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] ext4: Convert pa->pa_inode_list and pa->pa_obj_lock into a union Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16  8:02 ` Ojaswin Mujoo [this message]
2023-01-16 12:23   ` [PATCH v3 7/8] ext4: Use rbtrees to manage PAs instead of inode i_prealloc_list Jan Kara
2023-01-17 10:30     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-17 11:03       ` Jan Kara
2023-01-19  6:27         ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-27 14:43           ` Jan Kara
2023-02-03  8:36             ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-02-08 11:25               ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-02-09 10:54                 ` Jan Kara
2023-02-09 17:54                   ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-02-10 14:37                     ` Jan Kara
2023-02-13 17:58                       ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-02-14  8:50                         ` Jan Kara
2023-02-16 17:07                       ` Andreas Dilger
2023-03-17 12:40                         ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-16  8:02 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] ext4: Remove the logic to trim inode PAs Ojaswin Mujoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230116080216.249195-8-ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=brookxu.cn@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.