From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48DA82590 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2023 15:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2800C433D2; Sun, 22 Jan 2023 15:23:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1674401010; bh=1zJDZxcoLl6XwCPW4HOkZygAQSAOo50pws10uztRl60=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bFv51RsrBAMxmR++OPfcwk0Xkc+fFbJInpJ43PsoGCsvyGZv+rjhBU4I1HiURuXrO pJ5ZLspGW094Jp/n4eP+R4VlzC0iMPVFPkQrH/DX8I2U6TNFouZn1qRRETAquUCbX3 ckZh8lmYa2bK/nqi5uQgouIYaaQPbnTs1IM4Rz0A= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, David Hildenbrand , Peter Xu , Mike Kravetz , Miaohe Lin , Muchun Song , Andrew Morton Subject: [PATCH 6.1 076/193] mm/hugetlb: fix PTE marker handling in hugetlb_change_protection() Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2023 16:03:25 +0100 Message-Id: <20230122150249.816900015@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.1 In-Reply-To: <20230122150246.321043584@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20230122150246.321043584@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: David Hildenbrand commit 0e678153f5be7e6c8d28835f5a678618da4b7a9c upstream. Patch series "mm/hugetlb: uffd-wp fixes for hugetlb_change_protection()". Playing with virtio-mem and background snapshots (using uffd-wp) on hugetlb in QEMU, I managed to trigger a VM_BUG_ON(). Looking into the details, hugetlb_change_protection() seems to not handle uffd-wp correctly in all cases. Patch #1 fixes my test case. I don't have reproducers for patch #2, as it requires running into migration entries. I did not yet check in detail yet if !hugetlb code requires similar care. This patch (of 2): There are two problematic cases when stumbling over a PTE marker in hugetlb_change_protection(): (1) We protect an uffd-wp PTE marker a second time using uffd-wp: we will end up in the "!huge_pte_none(pte)" case and mess up the PTE marker. (2) We unprotect a uffd-wp PTE marker: we will similarly end up in the "!huge_pte_none(pte)" case even though we cleared the PTE, because the "pte" variable is stale. We'll mess up the PTE marker. For example, if we later stumble over such a "wrongly modified" PTE marker, we'll treat it like a present PTE that maps some garbage page. This can, for example, be triggered by mapping a memfd backed by huge pages, registering uffd-wp, uffd-wp'ing an unmapped page and (a) uffd-wp'ing it a second time; or (b) uffd-unprotecting it; or (c) unregistering uffd-wp. Then, ff we trigger fallocate(FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) on that file range, we will run into a VM_BUG_ON: [ 195.039560] page:00000000ba1f2987 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x0 [ 195.039565] flags: 0x7ffffc0001000(reserved|node=0|zone=0|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) [ 195.039568] raw: 0007ffffc0001000 ffffe742c0000008 ffffe742c0000008 0000000000000000 [ 195.039569] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 195.039569] page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(compound && !PageHead(page)) [ 195.039573] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 195.039574] kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:1346! [ 195.039579] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ 195.039581] CPU: 7 PID: 4777 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 6.0.12-200.fc36.x86_64 #1 [ 195.039583] Hardware name: LENOVO 20WNS1F81N/20WNS1F81N, BIOS N35ET50W (1.50 ) 09/15/2022 [ 195.039584] RIP: 0010:page_remove_rmap+0x45b/0x550 [ 195.039588] Code: [...] [ 195.039589] RSP: 0018:ffffbc03c3633ba8 EFLAGS: 00010292 [ 195.039591] RAX: 0000000000000040 RBX: ffffe742c0000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 195.039592] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffffffff8e7aac1a RDI: 00000000ffffffff [ 195.039592] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffbc03c3633a08 [ 195.039593] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffff8f146328 R12: ffff9b04c42754b0 [ 195.039594] R13: ffffffff8fcc6328 R14: ffffbc03c3633c80 R15: ffff9b0484ab9100 [ 195.039595] FS: 00007fc7aaf68640(0000) GS:ffff9b0bbf7c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 195.039596] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 195.039597] CR2: 000055d402c49110 CR3: 0000000159392003 CR4: 0000000000772ee0 [ 195.039598] PKRU: 55555554 [ 195.039599] Call Trace: [ 195.039600] [ 195.039602] __unmap_hugepage_range+0x33b/0x7d0 [ 195.039605] unmap_hugepage_range+0x55/0x70 [ 195.039608] hugetlb_vmdelete_list+0x77/0xa0 [ 195.039611] hugetlbfs_fallocate+0x410/0x550 [ 195.039612] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x23/0x40 [ 195.039616] vfs_fallocate+0x12e/0x360 [ 195.039618] __x64_sys_fallocate+0x40/0x70 [ 195.039620] do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80 [ 195.039623] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x17/0x40 [ 195.039624] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80 [ 195.039626] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 195.039628] RIP: 0033:0x7fc7b590651f [ 195.039653] Code: [...] [ 195.039654] RSP: 002b:00007fc7aaf66e70 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000011d [ 195.039655] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000558ef4b7f370 RCX: 00007fc7b590651f [ 195.039656] RDX: 0000000018000000 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: 000000000000000c [ 195.039657] RBP: 0000000008000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000073 [ 195.039658] R10: 0000000008000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000018000000 [ 195.039658] R13: 00007fb8bbe00000 R14: 000000000000000c R15: 0000000000001000 [ 195.039661] Fix it by not going into the "!huge_pte_none(pte)" case if we stumble over an exclusive marker. spin_unlock() + continue would get the job done. However, instead, make it clearer that there are no fall-through statements: we process each case (hwpoison, migration, marker, !none, none) and then unlock the page table to continue with the next PTE. Let's avoid "continue" statements and use a single spin_unlock() at the end. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222205511.675832-1-david@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222205511.675832-2-david@redhat.com Fixes: 60dfaad65aa9 ("mm/hugetlb: allow uffd wr-protect none ptes") Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Peter Xu Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz Cc: Miaohe Lin Cc: Muchun Song Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- mm/hugetlb.c | 21 +++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -6623,10 +6623,8 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection( } pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep); if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(pte))) { - spin_unlock(ptl); - continue; - } - if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_migration(pte))) { + /* Nothing to do. */ + } else if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_migration(pte))) { swp_entry_t entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte); struct page *page = pfn_swap_entry_to_page(entry); @@ -6647,18 +6645,13 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection( set_huge_pte_at(mm, address, ptep, newpte); pages++; } - spin_unlock(ptl); - continue; - } - if (unlikely(pte_marker_uffd_wp(pte))) { - /* - * This is changing a non-present pte into a none pte, - * no need for huge_ptep_modify_prot_start/commit(). - */ + } else if (unlikely(is_pte_marker(pte))) { + /* No other markers apply for now. */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_marker_uffd_wp(pte)); if (uffd_wp_resolve) + /* Safe to modify directly (non-present->none). */ huge_pte_clear(mm, address, ptep, psize); - } - if (!huge_pte_none(pte)) { + } else if (!huge_pte_none(pte)) { pte_t old_pte; unsigned int shift = huge_page_shift(hstate_vma(vma));