From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AF5C25B50 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233158AbjAWRfM (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 12:35:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40386 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233807AbjAWRe5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 12:34:57 -0500 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68A4A2FCE3; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 09:34:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D8F62184F; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:33:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1674495216; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ro2DBmNZbamdtWM6haiWhuRN1QfFV7RGG2FGjrIg8aM=; b=B0E16fqLvDIZc49JKXgQL1KMe/ZMdDf1geh0eLDSJpgE3iehTOteBtRWNmQXNHlzAd9Mp5 upoZmIC2c+wQl86xCM15+ELwNdr4p39JB8fTf0UH+u+0ld2rb68Kv0tGEZydJ5HDT2JmG3 WQuLYBaDSDbr21G8huC3rX1XK8dR6fQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1674495216; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ro2DBmNZbamdtWM6haiWhuRN1QfFV7RGG2FGjrIg8aM=; b=PCa+aAoeZfChR2FcxE8ZZmBB5qnvAlp26qjdtNHRr9bOHwHSWj3OrG3oOKdfw82sq9yTBL mSeAqIzzTwEe47CA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5845A1357F; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id qJNYB+7EzmOYHgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:33:34 +0000 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:33:31 -0300 From: Marcos Paulo de Souza To: Petr Mladek Cc: Marcos Paulo de Souza , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, joe.lawrence@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] livepatch: Add garbage collection for shadow variables Message-ID: <20230123173331.2rvelrrbkaitw56r@daedalus> References: <20221026194122.11761-1-mpdesouza@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 11:43:50AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Wed 2022-10-26 16:41:18, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This is the v2 of the livepatch shadow GC patches. The changes are minor since > > nobody asked for for big code changes. > > > > Changes from v1: > > * Reworked commit messages (Petr) > > * Added my SoB which was missing in some patches, or the ordering was wrong. (Josh) > > * Change __klp_shadow_get_or_use to __klp_shadow_get_or_add_locked and add a comment (Petr) > > * Add lockdep_assert_held on __klp_shadow_get_or_add_locked (Petr) > > about it's meaning (Petr) > > * CCing LKML (Josh) > > > > Some observations: > > * Petr has reviewed some of the patches that we created. I kept the Reviewed-by > > tags since he wrote the patches some time ago and now he reviewed them again > > on the ML. > > * There were questions about possible problems about using klp_shadow_types > > instead of using ids, but Petr already explained that internally it still uses > > the id to find the correct livepatch. > > * Regarding the possibility of multiple patches use the same ID, the problem > > already existed before. Petr suggested using a "stringified" version using > > name and id, but nobody has commented yet. I can implement such feature in a > > v3 if necessary. > > > > Marcos Paulo de Souza (2): > > livepatch/shadow: Introduce klp_shadow_type structure > > livepatch/shadow: Add garbage collection of shadow variables > > > > Petr Mladek (2): > > livepatch/shadow: Separate code to get or use pre-allocated shadow > > variable > > livepatch/shadow: Separate code removing all shadow variables for a > > given id > > From my POV, the patchset is ready for pushing upstream. Petr, what do you think about merging the first two patches, since they just cleanups and simplifications? > > Well, we need to get approval from kpatch-build users. Joe described > possible problems in replay for v3, see > https://lore.kernel.org/r/b5fc2891-2fb0-4aa7-01dd-861da22bb7ea@redhat.com > > Best Regards, > Petr