Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in: drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c between commit: 3d53aaef4332 ("tsnep: Fix TX queue stop/wake for multiple queues") from the net tree and commit: 25faa6a4c5ca ("tsnep: Replace TX spin_lock with __netif_tx_lock") from the net-next tree. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c index 00e2108f2ca4,e9dfefba5973..000000000000 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c @@@ -450,10 -458,8 +458,8 @@@ static netdev_tx_t tsnep_xmit_frame_rin /* ring full, shall not happen because queue is stopped if full * below */ - netif_stop_queue(tx->adapter->netdev); + netif_stop_subqueue(tx->adapter->netdev, tx->queue_index); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx->lock, flags); - return NETDEV_TX_BUSY; } @@@ -493,11 -495,9 +495,9 @@@ if (tsnep_tx_desc_available(tx) < (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1)) { /* ring can get full with next frame */ - netif_stop_queue(tx->adapter->netdev); + netif_stop_subqueue(tx->adapter->netdev, tx->queue_index); } - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx->lock, flags); - return NETDEV_TX_OK; } @@@ -567,13 -701,13 +701,13 @@@ static bool tsnep_tx_poll(struct tsnep_ } while (likely(budget)); if ((tsnep_tx_desc_available(tx) >= ((MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1) * 2)) && - netif_queue_stopped(tx->adapter->netdev)) { - netif_wake_queue(tx->adapter->netdev); + netif_tx_queue_stopped(nq)) { + netif_tx_wake_queue(nq); } - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx->lock, flags); + __netif_tx_unlock(nq); - return (budget != 0); + return budget != 0; } static bool tsnep_tx_pending(struct tsnep_tx *tx)