All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.3
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 18:07:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230221180756.0964fb2f@kernel.org> (raw)

Hi!

Here are the stats for the last release cycle: based on 15,383 emails
netdev has seen since Dec 15th, over 68 days (226 msgs / day).

Roughly 55% of the patches merged had a review tag (4% of which were
exclusively from the same email domain as the author). This means
an increase of 7% compared to the previous cycle (from 48%).

When comparing the stats note the fluctuation in total number of
messages (6.2 cycle had roughly 3k more messages).


Top 10 reviewers (thr):               Top 10 reviewers (msg):
   1. [276] Jakub Kicinski              1. [453] Jakub Kicinski 
   2. [118] Simon Horman                2. [234] Andrew Lunn
   3. [105] Leon Romanovsky             3. [232] Simon Horman
   4. [104] Andrew Lunn                 4. [184] Leon Romanovsky
   5. [ 88] Paolo Abeni                 5. [162] Jiri Pirko
   6. [ 62] Eric Dumazet                6. [125] Krzysztof Kozlowski
   7. [ 61] Jiri Pirko                  7. [121] Paolo Abeni
   8. [ 51] Krzysztof Kozlowski         8. [105] Eric Dumazet
   9. [ 43] Kalle Valo                  9. [102] Vladimir Oltean
  10. [ 42] Alexander Lobakin          10. [ 91] Michael S. Tsirkin

Simon (and Olek) were noticeably more active in this release cycle.
Russell has dropped out (he mentioned battling COVID).


Top 10 authors (thr):                 Top 10 authors (msg):
   1. [ 44] Jakub Kicinski              1. [283] Vladimir Oltean
   2. [ 41] Vladimir Oltean             2. [211] Saeed Mahameed
   3. [ 35] Tony Nguyen                 3. [184] Oleksij Rempel
   4. [ 33] Lorenzo Bianconi            4. [172] Jakub Kicinski
   5. [ 27] Stephen Rothwell            5. [145] Tony Nguyen
   6. [ 27] Eric Dumazet                6. [127] Lorenzo Bianconi
   7. [ 24] Arnd Bergmann               7. [126] Daniel Golle
   8. [ 21] Horatiu Vultur              8. [114] Jiri Pirko
   9. [ 18] Saeed Mahameed              9. [104] Aurelien Aptel
  10. [ 18] Jiri Pirko                 10. [100] Paul Blakey

Vladimir claims the top author spot continuing work on TSN (taprio, 
mqprio, MAC Merge uAPI and driver support).

Stephen Rothwell takes spot number 5, meaning we must have had 27
merge conflicts, lets try to have fewer conflicts going forward...

As for "scores" which are supposed to point out who doesn't help 
with reviewing (10 * reviews - 3 * authorship):

Top 10 scores (positive):             Top 10 scores (negative):
   1. [3446] Jakub Kicinski             1. [140] Lorenzo Bianconi
   2. [1590] Simon Horman               2. [ 91] Paul Blakey
   3. [1482] Andrew Lunn                3. [ 87] Oleksij Rempel
   4. [1336] Leon Romanovsky            4. [ 84] Stephen Rothwell
   5. [1069] Paolo Abeni                5. [ 83] Daniel Golle
   6. [ 821] Jiri Pirko                 6. [ 75] Alejandro Lucero
   7. [ 751] Krzysztof Kozlowski        7. [ 71] Yoshihiro Shimoda
   8. [ 720] Eric Dumazet               8. [ 66] Aurelien Aptel
   9. [ 559] Russell King               9. [ 60] Jason Xing
  10. [ 552] Alexander Lobakin         10. [ 58] Piergiorgio Beruto

Lorenzo, Paul and Oleksij author much more than they review :)
Although in all fairness most folks on the list are there due
to reving the same series rather than generating a lot of code.

Interestingly the flow of semi-automated trivial patches seem 
to have slowed down significantly (authors of those previously
occupied most of the top 5 spots).


As for the corporate stats:

Top 7 reviewers (thr):                Top 7 reviewers (msg):
   1. [340] Meta                        1. [623] Meta
   2. [210] Intel                       2. [463] Intel
   3. [191] nVidia                      3. [439] RedHat
   4. [178] RedHat                      4. [437] nVidia
   5. [125] Google                      5. [238] Corigine
   6. [120] Corigine                    6. [234] Andrew Lunn
   7. [104] Andrew Lunn                 7. [225] Google

Intel takes the #2 spot from nVidia. Corigine makes an appearance 
thanks to Simon's work.

Top 7 authors (thr):                  Top 7 authors (msg):
   1. [142] RedHat                      1. [923] nVidia
   2. [137] nVidia                      2. [445] RedHat
   3. [128] Intel                       3. [406] Intel 
   4. [ 77] Google                      4. [324] NXP
   5. [ 60] Meta                        5. [271] Microchip
   6. [ 58] NXP                         6. [268] Pengutronix
   7. [ 54] Microchip                   7. [213] Meta

Top 12 scores (positive):             Top scores (negative):
   1. [4358] Meta                       1. [127] Marvell
   2. [2437] Intel                      2. [120] Alibaba
   3. [2008] RedHat                     ...
   4. [1910] nVidia                     5. [ 71] Bootlin
   5. [1622] Corigine                   ...
   6. [1482] Andrew Lunn                8. [ 52] Renesas
   7. [1371] Google                     9. [ 51] ZTE
   8. [ 916] Linaro                     ... one-time contributors follow
   9. [ 741] Oracle
  10. [ 504] Kalle Valo
  11. [ 498] Rob Herring
  12. [ 489] Broadcom

Positive scores mostly match the review ranking (with RedHat jumping
to #3, given nVidia's large patch volume). As mentioned bots have
mostly disappeared in this release cycle, Marvell and Alibaba are 
the top "net negative" contributors in terms of reviews. Microchip 
has dropped off the negative list.

Code: https://github.com/kuba-moo/ml-stat

                 reply	other threads:[~2023-02-22  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230221180756.0964fb2f@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.