From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552BBC64ED6 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 22:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230286AbjB0Wc3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2023 17:32:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37594 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230201AbjB0Wbh (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2023 17:31:37 -0500 Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 817E3298F0; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 14:31:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1677537091; x=1709073091; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references; bh=D7r3sPYzuOicvyDyAiCcjJlcjrFZlOzlMPKscQsbvdA=; b=D00v5Cw/5/5Swn5WtRlN8Wc/Tvnp2pi2PmadrF0xeFldyaSNTUiC4mma ctjh5gzMvHmnNiH5gLjexWKh7kj1JIaQudKFLTKNbIK6sCx2oEUQKyAcg g1LUhBIO/ySzywfA+LCf0DKYwoVGnpjPe6qVpWuTQm7nLk/NnrwfF+3El P7PvrIwdMGbVv8F7hqCcTtWV1TW0tuq0LwWGVhpFvvRBiQnjzetZE9mz5 cFCBpfVnayYl+lN21ZSHTL+apWPHCJ4c4Tfzl/FAma5HdHi6UUczlXQjA Vj2rWVBX+P41QVu2hT1jyGmH1Gct62dp4+DPfR9d0IFhqh3RcELBlNxP0 w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10634"; a="313657127" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,220,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="313657127" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Feb 2023 14:31:12 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10634"; a="848024393" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,220,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="848024393" Received: from leonqu-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO rpedgeco-desk.amr.corp.intel.com) ([10.209.72.19]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Feb 2023 14:31:11 -0800 From: Rick Edgecombe To: x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Borislav Petkov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H . J . Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , Weijiang Yang , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , John Allen , kcc@google.com, eranian@google.com, rppt@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com, dethoma@microsoft.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com, christina.schimpe@intel.com, david@redhat.com, debug@rivosinc.com Cc: rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com Subject: [PATCH v7 06/41] x86/fpu: Add helper for modifying xstate Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 14:29:22 -0800 Message-Id: <20230227222957.24501-7-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20230227222957.24501-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> References: <20230227222957.24501-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Just like user xfeatures, supervisor xfeatures can be active in the registers or present in the task FPU buffer. If the registers are active, the registers can be modified directly. If the registers are not active, the modification must be performed on the task FPU buffer. When the state is not active, the kernel could perform modifications directly to the buffer. But in order for it to do that, it needs to know where in the buffer the specific state it wants to modify is located. Doing this is not robust against optimizations that compact the FPU buffer, as each access would require computing where in the buffer it is. The easiest way to modify supervisor xfeature data is to force restore the registers and write directly to the MSRs. Often times this is just fine anyway as the registers need to be restored before returning to userspace. Do this for now, leaving buffer writing optimizations for the future. Add a new function fpregs_lock_and_load() that can simultaneously call fpregs_lock() and do this restore. Also perform some extra sanity checks in this function since this will be used in non-fpu focused code. Tested-by: Pengfei Xu Tested-by: John Allen Tested-by: Kees Cook Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe --- v6: - Drop "but appear to work" (Boris) v5: - Fix spelling error (Boris) - Don't export fpregs_lock_and_load() (Boris) v3: - Rename to fpregs_lock_and_load() to match the unlocking fpregs_unlock(). (Kees) - Elaborate in comment about helper. (Dave) v2: - Drop optimization of writing directly the buffer, and change API accordingly. - fpregs_lock_and_load() suggested by tglx - Some commit log verbiage from dhansen --- arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h | 9 +++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h index 503a577814b2..aadc6893dcaa 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h @@ -82,6 +82,15 @@ static inline void fpregs_unlock(void) preempt_enable(); } +/* + * FPU state gets lazily restored before returning to userspace. So when in the + * kernel, the valid FPU state may be kept in the buffer. This function will force + * restore all the fpu state to the registers early if needed, and lock them from + * being automatically saved/restored. Then FPU state can be modified safely in the + * registers, before unlocking with fpregs_unlock(). + */ +void fpregs_lock_and_load(void); + #ifdef CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU extern void fpregs_assert_state_consistent(void); #else diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c index caf33486dc5e..f851558b673f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c @@ -753,6 +753,24 @@ void switch_fpu_return(void) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(switch_fpu_return); +void fpregs_lock_and_load(void) +{ + /* + * fpregs_lock() only disables preemption (mostly). So modifying state + * in an interrupt could screw up some in progress fpregs operation. + * Warn about it. + */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(!irq_fpu_usable()); + WARN_ON_ONCE(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD); + + fpregs_lock(); + + fpregs_assert_state_consistent(); + + if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD)) + fpregs_restore_userregs(); +} + #ifdef CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU /* * If current FPU state according to its tracking (loaded FPU context on this -- 2.17.1