All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915: Extract skl_wm_latency()
Date: Wed,  1 Mar 2023 18:24:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230301162449.26672-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230301162449.26672-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Extract the skl+ wm latency determination into a small helper
so that everyone has the same idea what the latency should be.

This introduces a slight functional change in that
skl_cursor_allocation() will now start to account for the
extra 4 usec that the kbk/cfl/cml IPC w/a adds.

v2: Rebase

Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 40 +++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
index 1300965d328a..7d49a42b9d90 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
@@ -705,6 +705,28 @@ static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 				 const struct skl_wm_level *result_prev,
 				 struct skl_wm_level *result /* out */);
 
+static unsigned int skl_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *i915, int level,
+				   const struct skl_wm_params *wp)
+{
+	unsigned int latency = i915->display.wm.skl_latency[level];
+
+	if (latency == 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * WaIncreaseLatencyIPCEnabled: kbl,cfl
+	 * Display WA #1141: kbl,cfl
+	 */
+	if ((IS_KABYLAKE(i915) || IS_COFFEELAKE(i915) || IS_COMETLAKE(i915)) &&
+	    skl_watermark_ipc_enabled(i915))
+		latency += 4;
+
+	if (skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(i915) && wp->x_tiled)
+		latency += 15;
+
+	return latency;
+}
+
 static unsigned int
 skl_cursor_allocation(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 		      int num_active)
@@ -724,7 +746,7 @@ skl_cursor_allocation(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 	drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, ret);
 
 	for (level = 0; level < i915->display.wm.num_levels; level++) {
-		unsigned int latency = i915->display.wm.skl_latency[level];
+		unsigned int latency = skl_wm_latency(i915, level, &wp);
 
 		skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, plane, level, latency, &wp, &wm, &wm);
 		if (wm.min_ddb_alloc == U16_MAX)
@@ -1840,17 +1862,6 @@ static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * WaIncreaseLatencyIPCEnabled: kbl,cfl
-	 * Display WA #1141: kbl,cfl
-	 */
-	if ((IS_KABYLAKE(i915) || IS_COFFEELAKE(i915) || IS_COMETLAKE(i915)) &&
-	    skl_watermark_ipc_enabled(i915))
-		latency += 4;
-
-	if (skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(i915) && wp->x_tiled)
-		latency += 15;
-
 	method1 = skl_wm_method1(i915, wp->plane_pixel_rate,
 				 wp->cpp, latency, wp->dbuf_block_size);
 	method2 = skl_wm_method2(wp->plane_pixel_rate,
@@ -1977,7 +1988,7 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 
 	for (level = 0; level < i915->display.wm.num_levels; level++) {
 		struct skl_wm_level *result = &levels[level];
-		unsigned int latency = i915->display.wm.skl_latency[level];
+		unsigned int latency = skl_wm_latency(i915, level, wm_params);
 
 		skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, plane, level, latency,
 				     wm_params, result_prev, result);
@@ -1997,7 +2008,8 @@ static void tgl_compute_sagv_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 	unsigned int latency = 0;
 
 	if (i915->display.sagv.block_time_us)
-		latency = i915->display.sagv.block_time_us + i915->display.wm.skl_latency[0];
+		latency = i915->display.sagv.block_time_us +
+			skl_wm_latency(i915, 0, wm_params);
 
 	skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, plane, 0, latency,
 			     wm_params, &levels[0],
-- 
2.39.2


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-01 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-01 16:24 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/2] drm/i915: vblank stuff Ville Syrjala
2023-03-01 16:24 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2023-03-01 16:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915: Reject wm levels that exceed vblank time Ville Syrjala
2023-03-06 16:48   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 " Ville Syrjala
2023-03-01 22:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: vblank stuff (rev3) Patchwork
2023-03-05  0:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-03-08 23:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: vblank stuff (rev6) Patchwork
2023-03-10 15:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230301162449.26672-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.