From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03749C678D4 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2023 17:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229567AbjCBROD (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2023 12:14:03 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50184 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229437AbjCBROC (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2023 12:14:02 -0500 Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAE5525E02; Thu, 2 Mar 2023 09:14:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1677777241; x=1709313241; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7KR7GFzhVzDZCKMNzsEZi/lu67Vgbj19JPrpCXd1srE=; b=DBPbQ1JzAn2qyIHdYJxn5hINjXT8+3hIl/jTODb0LwgMakmSiWoeNs5R wF+maKgpLC54nHekAZTVnm0nHrbqqqW728rPAX4BksZJ2+VzZQuNCNiA8 7HwtGelKz23zgPpiYIrf1X27O1KtPadkOm/SFB6XrM2Nqcf/G84FQ5ROB MlZ5G9962Bf7PSAYKt9Ehr4RFvbSYl7AcGACwEdQi/PGPYPNx3go8bMjA Bm6RaWXZYPK3YCtDg9Pkd1q3kC+KinYNuf8gU7IOvsh62/vx+aDGhwZ3T Vc7WVxVj+zGeDZYcjFFnoy494sXsKGIBcblW6szJ0ualGEyGLPt2mYNRB A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10637"; a="314445720" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,228,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="314445720" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Mar 2023 09:13:19 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10637"; a="625019051" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,228,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="625019051" Received: from jacob-builder.jf.intel.com (HELO jacob-builder) ([10.24.100.114]) by orsmga003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Mar 2023 09:13:18 -0800 Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 09:17:07 -0800 From: Jacob Pan To: Baolu Lu Cc: LKML , iommu@lists.linux.dev, Jason Gunthorpe , Joerg Roedel , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , X86 Kernel , bp@alien8.de, "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , corbet@lwn.net, vkoul@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Robin Murphy , Will Deacon , David Woodhouse , Raj Ashok , "Tian, Kevin" , Yi Liu , "Yu, Fenghua" , Dave Jiang , Kirill Shutemov , jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] iommu/sva: Stop using ioasid_set for SVA Message-ID: <20230302091707.58d59964@jacob-builder> In-Reply-To: <3b7fb4d3-1fe9-a3be-46ad-c271be9f96c7@linux.intel.com> References: <20230301235646.2692846-1-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <20230301235646.2692846-4-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <3b7fb4d3-1fe9-a3be-46ad-c271be9f96c7@linux.intel.com> Organization: OTC X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org Hi Baolu, On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 21:01:42 +0800, Baolu Lu wrote: > On 2023/3/2 7:56, Jacob Pan wrote: > > From: Jason Gunthorpe > > > > Instead SVA drivers can use a simple global IDA to allocate PASIDs for > > each mm_struct. > > > > Future work would be to allow drivers using the SVA APIs to reserve > > global PASIDs from this IDA for their internal use, eg with the DMA API > > PASID support. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan > > --- > > v4: > > - Keep GFP_ATOMIC flag for PASID allocation, will changed to > > GFP_KERNEL in a separate patch. > > --- > > drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c | 62 ++++++++++----------------------------- > > drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h | 3 -- > > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c > > index 376b2a9e2543..297852ae5e7c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c > > @@ -9,26 +9,13 @@ > > #include "iommu-sva.h" > > > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(iommu_sva_lock); > > -static DECLARE_IOASID_SET(iommu_sva_pasid); > > +static DEFINE_IDA(iommu_global_pasid_ida); > > > > -/** > > - * iommu_sva_alloc_pasid - Allocate a PASID for the mm > > - * @mm: the mm > > - * @min: minimum PASID value (inclusive) > > - * @max: maximum PASID value (inclusive) > > - * > > - * Try to allocate a PASID for this mm, or take a reference to the > > existing one > > - * provided it fits within the [@min, @max] range. On success the > > PASID is > > - * available in mm->pasid and will be available for the lifetime of > > the mm. > > - * > > - * Returns 0 on success and < 0 on error. > > - */ > > -int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t > > max) +static int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t > > min, ioasid_t max) { > > - int ret = 0; > > - ioasid_t pasid; > > + int ret; > > > > - if (min == INVALID_IOASID || max == INVALID_IOASID || > > + if (min == IOMMU_PASID_INVALID || max == IOMMU_PASID_INVALID || > > min == 0 || max < min) > > It's irrelevant to this patch. Just out of curiosity, why do we need to > exclude PASID 0 here? I just had a quick look at PCI spec section 6.20. > The spec does not state that PASID 0 is invalid. > my understanding is that ARM reserves PASID0, unlike VT-d where RID_PASID is programmable. > > return -EINVAL; > > > > @@ -37,39 +24,20 @@ int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, > > ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max) if (pasid_valid(mm->pasid)) { > > if (mm->pasid < min || mm->pasid >= max) > > ret = -EOVERFLOW; > > + else > > + ret = 0; > > Nit: > > If you didn't change "int ret = 0" to "int ret", we don't need above two > lines. Did I miss anything? > you are right > > goto out; > > } > > > > - pasid = ioasid_alloc(&iommu_sva_pasid, min, max, mm); > > - if (!pasid_valid(pasid)) > > - ret = -ENOMEM; > > - else > > - mm->pasid = ret; > > + ret = ida_alloc_range(&iommu_global_pasid_ida, min, max, > > GFP_ATOMIC); > > + if (ret < min) > > Nit: > ret < 0? will do > ida_alloc_range() returns negative error number on failure. > > > + goto out; > > + mm->pasid = ret; > > + ret = 0; > > out: > > mutex_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); > > return ret; > > } > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_alloc_pasid); > > - > > -/* ioasid_find getter() requires a void * argument */ > > -static bool __mmget_not_zero(void *mm) > > -{ > > - return mmget_not_zero(mm); > > -} > > - > > -/** > > - * iommu_sva_find() - Find mm associated to the given PASID > > - * @pasid: Process Address Space ID assigned to the mm > > - * > > - * On success a reference to the mm is taken, and must be released > > with mmput(). > > - * > > - * Returns the mm corresponding to this PASID, or an error if not > > found. > > - */ > > -struct mm_struct *iommu_sva_find(ioasid_t pasid) > > -{ > > - return ioasid_find(&iommu_sva_pasid, pasid, __mmget_not_zero); > > -} > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_find); > > Removing iommu_sva_find() has nothing to do with the intention of this > patch. Perhaps make it in a separated patch? will do > > > > /** > > * iommu_sva_bind_device() - Bind a process address space to a device > > @@ -241,8 +209,8 @@ iommu_sva_handle_iopf(struct iommu_fault *fault, > > void *data) > > void mm_pasid_drop(struct mm_struct *mm) > > { > > - if (pasid_valid(mm->pasid)) { > > - ioasid_free(mm->pasid); > > - mm->pasid = INVALID_IOASID; > > - } > > + if (likely(!pasid_valid(mm->pasid))) > > Why is this a likely? most mm does not have a PASID, thus initialized with invalid ioasid during fork. This function is called for every mm. > > + return; > > + > > + ida_free(&iommu_global_pasid_ida, mm->pasid); > > } > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h > > index 7215a761b962..c22d0174ad61 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h > > @@ -8,9 +8,6 @@ > > #include > > #include > > > > -int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t > > max); -struct mm_struct *iommu_sva_find(ioasid_t pasid); > > - > > /* I/O Page fault */ > > struct device; > > struct iommu_fault; > > Best regards, > baolu Thanks, Jacob