From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] iommu: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:47:09 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20230310144709.1542910-1-robh@kernel.org> (raw) It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test for presence of a property and nothing more. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> --- drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 2 +- drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c index 2ff7a72cf377..d0843caf8760 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_register_legacy_master(struct device *dev, int err; np = dev_get_dev_node(dev); - if (!np || !of_find_property(np, "#stream-id-cells", NULL)) { + if (!np || !of_property_present(np, "#stream-id-cells")) { of_node_put(np); return -ENODEV; } diff --git a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c index bdf1a4e5eae0..f4470303d906 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c @@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@ static int ipmmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) * the lack of has_cache_leaf_nodes flag or renesas,ipmmu-main property. */ if (!mmu->features->has_cache_leaf_nodes || - !of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "renesas,ipmmu-main", NULL)) + !of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "renesas,ipmmu-main")) mmu->root = mmu; else mmu->root = ipmmu_find_root(); -- 2.39.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] iommu: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:47:09 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20230310144709.1542910-1-robh@kernel.org> (raw) It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test for presence of a property and nothing more. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> --- drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 2 +- drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c index 2ff7a72cf377..d0843caf8760 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_register_legacy_master(struct device *dev, int err; np = dev_get_dev_node(dev); - if (!np || !of_find_property(np, "#stream-id-cells", NULL)) { + if (!np || !of_property_present(np, "#stream-id-cells")) { of_node_put(np); return -ENODEV; } diff --git a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c index bdf1a4e5eae0..f4470303d906 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c @@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@ static int ipmmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) * the lack of has_cache_leaf_nodes flag or renesas,ipmmu-main property. */ if (!mmu->features->has_cache_leaf_nodes || - !of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "renesas,ipmmu-main", NULL)) + !of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "renesas,ipmmu-main")) mmu->root = mmu; else mmu->root = ipmmu_find_root(); -- 2.39.2 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-10 14:50 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-03-10 14:47 Rob Herring [this message] 2023-03-10 14:47 ` [PATCH] iommu: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence Rob Herring 2023-03-10 16:17 ` Robin Murphy 2023-03-10 16:17 ` Robin Murphy 2023-03-22 13:55 ` Joerg Roedel 2023-03-22 13:55 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20230310144709.1542910-1-robh@kernel.org \ --to=robh@kernel.org \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \ --cc=joro@8bytes.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.