All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/i915/rps: split out display rps parts to a separate file
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:04:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230321230448.rkgnfemrg4ehwfat@ldmartin-desk2.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sfdy6q9k.fsf@intel.com>

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 06:08:39PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>On Tue, 21 Mar 2023, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2023, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
>>> Split out the RPS parts so they can be conditionally compiled out later.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>>> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230302164936.3034161-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
>>> (cherry picked from commit 6dbbff25b39565c801c87379bc85933fb436518e)
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Here's an example of an upstream i915 commit that can help clean up
>>> cherry-pick as well as cleanup of the #ifdefs in one go, otherwise it
>>> breaks bisect.
>>
>> *sigh* I had something more here, but having #ifdef first on a line
>> dropped it as comments, and turned it into nonsense.
>>
>> It's a backport of upstream i915 commit to help clean up #ifdefs, but
>> how do we want to handle them?
>
>Moreover, even if we're stalling with adding such #ifdefs to upstream
>i915 now, we can however clean up existing usage in the xe branch to be
>more suitable for upstream. For example, I'd take the #ifdefs here
>pretty much without issues.

instead of a cherry-pick + squashed-ifdef-removal I think it's better
to do:

1) cherry-pick
2) remove ifdefs and commit with

	git commit -s --fixup=38a139546384

   ... or whatever commit added them (there are a few before that commit
   above)

The reason is that I don't think we will be able to avoid 1 more rebase
before being merged upstream.  We can't do merge-approach neither
because of these commits we don't really want to ever show up in
upstream (and because we are on top of drm-tip rather than e.g.
drm-next). So doing the above at least makes a rebase more bearable:

Whenever we do a rebase (with --autosquash) the cherry-pick should
automatically be dropped by git and the fixup should automatically remove
the addition of the ifdefs in the commit that added them.

Lucas De Marchi

>
>BR,
>Jani.
>
>
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile                 |  1 +
>>>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c | 85 ++-----------------
>>>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.c  | 81 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.h  | 34 ++++++++
>>>  4 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.c
>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
>>> index ae9259ab3261..f689132e1506 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
>>> @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ i915-y += \
>>>  	display/intel_display_power.o \
>>>  	display/intel_display_power_map.o \
>>>  	display/intel_display_power_well.o \
>>> +	display/intel_display_rps.o \
>>>  	display/intel_dmc.o \
>>>  	display/intel_dpio_phy.o \
>>>  	display/intel_dpll.o \
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
>>> index 3d37f44ec835..e666a5c1fd91 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
>>> @@ -34,13 +34,10 @@
>>>  #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
>>>  #include <drm/drm_fourcc.h>
>>>
>>> -#ifdef I915
>>> -#include "gt/intel_rps.h"
>>> -#endif
>>> -
>>>  #include "i915_config.h"
>>>  #include "intel_atomic_plane.h"
>>>  #include "intel_cdclk.h"
>>> +#include "intel_display_rps.h"
>>>  #include "intel_display_trace.h"
>>>  #include "intel_display_types.h"
>>>  #include "intel_fb.h"
>>> @@ -951,66 +948,6 @@ int intel_atomic_plane_check_clipping(struct intel_plane_state *plane_state,
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -#ifdef I915
>>> -struct wait_rps_boost {
>>> -	struct wait_queue_entry wait;
>>> -
>>> -	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>>> -	struct i915_request *request;
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -static int do_rps_boost(struct wait_queue_entry *_wait,
>>> -			unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
>>> -{
>>> -	struct wait_rps_boost *wait = container_of(_wait, typeof(*wait), wait);
>>> -	struct i915_request *rq = wait->request;
>>> -
>>> -	/*
>>> -	 * If we missed the vblank, but the request is already running it
>>> -	 * is reasonable to assume that it will complete before the next
>>> -	 * vblank without our intervention, so leave RPS alone.
>>> -	 */
>>> -	if (!i915_request_started(rq))
>>> -		intel_rps_boost(rq);
>>> -	i915_request_put(rq);
>>> -
>>> -	drm_crtc_vblank_put(wait->crtc);
>>> -
>>> -	list_del(&wait->wait.entry);
>>> -	kfree(wait);
>>> -	return 1;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static void add_rps_boost_after_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>>> -				       struct dma_fence *fence)
>>> -{
>>> -	struct wait_rps_boost *wait;
>>> -
>>> -	if (!dma_fence_is_i915(fence))
>>> -		return;
>>> -
>>> -	if (DISPLAY_VER(to_i915(crtc->dev)) < 6)
>>> -		return;
>>> -
>>> -	if (drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc))
>>> -		return;
>>> -
>>> -	wait = kmalloc(sizeof(*wait), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> -	if (!wait) {
>>> -		drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc);
>>> -		return;
>>> -	}
>>> -
>>> -	wait->request = to_request(dma_fence_get(fence));
>>> -	wait->crtc = crtc;
>>> -
>>> -	wait->wait.func = do_rps_boost;
>>> -	wait->wait.flags = 0;
>>> -
>>> -	add_wait_queue(drm_crtc_vblank_waitqueue(crtc), &wait->wait);
>>> -}
>>> -#endif
>>> -
>>>  /**
>>>   * intel_prepare_plane_fb - Prepare fb for usage on plane
>>>   * @_plane: drm plane to prepare for
>>> @@ -1102,13 +1039,13 @@ intel_prepare_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *_plane,
>>>  		dma_resv_iter_begin(&cursor, obj->base.resv,
>>>  				    DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE);
>>>  		dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked(&cursor, fence) {
>>> -			add_rps_boost_after_vblank(new_plane_state->hw.crtc,
>>> -						   fence);
>>> +			intel_display_rps_boost_after_vblank(new_plane_state->hw.crtc,
>>> +							     fence);
>>>  		}
>>>  		dma_resv_iter_end(&cursor);
>>>  	} else {
>>> -		add_rps_boost_after_vblank(new_plane_state->hw.crtc,
>>> -					   new_plane_state->uapi.fence);
>>> +		intel_display_rps_boost_after_vblank(new_plane_state->hw.crtc,
>>> +						     new_plane_state->uapi.fence);
>>>  	}
>>>
>>>  	/*
>>> @@ -1119,10 +1056,7 @@ intel_prepare_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *_plane,
>>>  	 * that are not quite steady state without resorting to forcing
>>>  	 * maximum clocks following a vblank miss (see do_rps_boost()).
>>>  	 */
>>> -	if (!state->rps_interactive) {
>>> -		intel_rps_mark_interactive(&to_gt(dev_priv)->rps, true);
>>> -		state->rps_interactive = true;
>>> -	}
>>> +	intel_display_rps_mark_interactive(dev_priv, state, true);
>>>
>>>  	return 0;
>>>
>>> @@ -1159,12 +1093,7 @@ intel_cleanup_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *plane,
>>>  	if (!obj)
>>>  		return;
>>>
>>> -#ifdef I915
>>> -	if (state->rps_interactive) {
>>> -		intel_rps_mark_interactive(&to_gt(dev_priv)->rps, false);
>>> -		state->rps_interactive = false;
>>> -	}
>>> -#endif
>>> +	intel_display_rps_mark_interactive(dev_priv, state, false);
>>>
>>>  	/* Should only be called after a successful intel_prepare_plane_fb()! */
>>>  	intel_plane_unpin_fb(old_plane_state);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..918d0327169a
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <drm/drm_crtc.h>
>>> +#include <drm/drm_vblank.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include "gt/intel_rps.h"
>>> +#include "i915_drv.h"
>>> +#include "intel_display_rps.h"
>>> +#include "intel_display_types.h"
>>> +
>>> +struct wait_rps_boost {
>>> +	struct wait_queue_entry wait;
>>> +
>>> +	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>>> +	struct i915_request *request;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static int do_rps_boost(struct wait_queue_entry *_wait,
>>> +			unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct wait_rps_boost *wait = container_of(_wait, typeof(*wait), wait);
>>> +	struct i915_request *rq = wait->request;
>>> +
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * If we missed the vblank, but the request is already running it
>>> +	 * is reasonable to assume that it will complete before the next
>>> +	 * vblank without our intervention, so leave RPS alone.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if (!i915_request_started(rq))
>>> +		intel_rps_boost(rq);
>>> +	i915_request_put(rq);
>>> +
>>> +	drm_crtc_vblank_put(wait->crtc);
>>> +
>>> +	list_del(&wait->wait.entry);
>>> +	kfree(wait);
>>> +	return 1;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void intel_display_rps_boost_after_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>>> +					  struct dma_fence *fence)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct wait_rps_boost *wait;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!dma_fence_is_i915(fence))
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(to_i915(crtc->dev)) < 6)
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>> +	if (drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc))
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>> +	wait = kmalloc(sizeof(*wait), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	if (!wait) {
>>> +		drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc);
>>> +		return;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	wait->request = to_request(dma_fence_get(fence));
>>> +	wait->crtc = crtc;
>>> +
>>> +	wait->wait.func = do_rps_boost;
>>> +	wait->wait.flags = 0;
>>> +
>>> +	add_wait_queue(drm_crtc_vblank_waitqueue(crtc), &wait->wait);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void intel_display_rps_mark_interactive(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>> +					struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>>> +					bool interactive)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (state->rps_interactive == interactive)
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>> +	intel_rps_mark_interactive(&to_gt(i915)->rps, interactive);
>>> +	state->rps_interactive = interactive;
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..2cfb8a303b77
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef __INTEL_DISPLAY_RPS_H__
>>> +#define __INTEL_DISPLAY_RPS_H__
>>> +
>>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>>> +
>>> +struct dma_fence;
>>> +struct drm_crtc;
>>> +struct drm_i915_private;
>>> +struct intel_atomic_state;
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef I915
>>> +void intel_display_rps_boost_after_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>>> +					  struct dma_fence *fence);
>>> +void intel_display_rps_mark_interactive(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>> +					struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>>> +					bool interactive);
>>> +#else
>>> +static inline void intel_display_rps_boost_after_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>>> +							struct dma_fence *fence)
>>> +{
>>> +}
>>> +static inline void intel_display_rps_mark_interactive(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>> +						      struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>>> +						      bool interactive)
>>> +{
>>> +}
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> +#endif /* __INTEL_DISPLAY_RPS_H__ */
>
>-- 
>Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-21 23:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-21 16:04 [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/i915/rps: split out display rps parts to a separate file Jani Nikula
2023-03-21 16:07 ` Jani Nikula
2023-03-21 16:08   ` Jani Nikula
2023-03-21 23:04     ` Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2023-03-22  9:15       ` Jani Nikula
2023-03-22 13:28         ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-22 14:27           ` Jani Nikula
2023-03-22 20:57             ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-03-23 11:13               ` Jani Nikula
2023-03-21 16:09 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2023-03-21 16:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-03-21 16:14 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-03-21 16:25 ` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230321230448.rkgnfemrg4ehwfat@ldmartin-desk2.lan \
    --to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.