All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode: move @microcode_mutex definition near usage
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:19:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230324151933.GCZB2/hUOFuECIF1AG@fat_crate.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87edpenvkh.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>

On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 02:17:10PM +0106, John Ogness wrote:
> I was doing some tests with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT. I did not think that
> mattered, since the mutex is obviously defined but not used for
> !CONFIG_MICROCODE_LATE_LOADING.

Oh sure, I see that. I'd still like to have in the commit message why
exactly it happens.

> Digging deeper I see that initializing @wait_list in
> __MUTEX_INITIALIZER() is what is allowing unused global mutexes to go
> unnoticed. Since with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT the mutex is different and
> initialized differently, it is (correctly) detected as unused.
> 
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT cannot be enabled yet, so this patch is not urgent for
> mainline. But at some point it will need fixing.

Sure, send it to me when it can be triggered with a .config with the
upstream tree, along with exact explanation how it happens and I'll
queue it.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-24 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-24 11:47 [PATCH] x86/microcode: move @microcode_mutex definition near usage John Ogness
2023-03-24 12:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-24 13:11   ` John Ogness
2023-03-24 15:19     ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2023-03-24 16:33       ` John Ogness
2023-03-24 16:44         ` Borislav Petkov
2023-07-12 14:09     ` John B. Wyatt IV

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230324151933.GCZB2/hUOFuECIF1AG@fat_crate.local \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.