On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 03:57:33PM +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 10:20:30AM +0800, Xingyu Wu wrote:
> [...]
> >  #ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_STARFIVE_JH7110_CRG_H__
> >  #define __DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_STARFIVE_JH7110_CRG_H__
> >  
> > +/* PLL clocks */
> > +#define JH7110_CLK_PLL0_OUT			0
> > +#define JH7110_CLK_PLL1_OUT			1
> > +#define JH7110_CLK_PLL2_OUT			2
> 
> In U-Boot commit 58c9c60b Yanhong Wang added:
> 
> +
> +#define JH7110_SYSCLK_PLL0_OUT                       190
> +#define JH7110_SYSCLK_PLL1_OUT                       191
> +#define JH7110_SYSCLK_PLL2_OUT                       192
> +
> +#define JH7110_SYSCLK_END                    193
> 
> in that respective file.
> 
> > +#define JH7110_PLLCLK_END			3
> > +
> >  /* SYSCRG clocks */
> >  #define JH7110_SYSCLK_CPU_ROOT			0
> 
> If the symbolic names referred to the same items, would it be possible
> to keep the two files in sync somehow?

Ohh, that's not good.. If you pass the U-Boot dtb to Linux it won't
understand the numbering. The headers are part of the dt-binding :/