From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D62C7EE2D for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 19:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232726AbjEXTL1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 May 2023 15:11:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41186 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231278AbjEXTLZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 May 2023 15:11:25 -0400 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com (lelv0142.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.249]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B3BD12E; Wed, 24 May 2023 12:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 34OJAxne112230; Wed, 24 May 2023 14:10:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1684955459; bh=44ofO+fg5oAkQw3fphX2FkEvo3iqoYAXa6FicyN/lQ4=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=iIxusKymMCG6l23dWRsgMNIhzkYFVqno1SK3rkRxkd02fITtP8EReVDw3ka1YSaap j+7OWDwBEOazxFJ7AN3CHopww6t4c/ClqKGOrUNy6y2PGc7JlIOadVmGvZ768POjrg VFid4Lgyv4SLRLKKH3+Yf6jhxELKf2UQYXDTRrXA= Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (dlee113.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.24]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 34OJAwMv099824 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 24 May 2023 14:10:59 -0500 Received: from DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Wed, 24 May 2023 14:10:58 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 24 May 2023 14:10:58 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileaxei01-snat.itg.ti.com [10.180.69.5]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 34OJAwiM025082; Wed, 24 May 2023 14:10:58 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 14:10:58 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Andrew Davis CC: Francesco Dolcini , Vignesh Raghavendra , Francesco Dolcini , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: ti: add toradex,verdin-am62 et al. Message-ID: <20230524191058.fkvl255j6fjcm4m5@unabashed> References: <20230524143631.42471-1-francesco@dolcini.it> <20230524143631.42471-2-francesco@dolcini.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12:48-20230524, Andrew Davis wrote: [..] > In fact I'm not sure we get much value at all out of top level whole-SoC compatible > strings. Maybe we did when there was matching in kernel to do device specific fixups, > but that isn't really used much in ARM64. If you are arguing about const: ti,am625 - there is a bunch more other S/w systems that use compatibles for various purposes in addition to usage in userspace (test systems etc) that benefit. Unless there is a ARM64 wide trend to drop it, I don't see a reason to have a discussion on that. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6256CC77B73 for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 19:12:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=wkfb9tPCzWSZkMleMwkwdUjJ2RIUP9ZjXxZ1odklup8=; b=b9BUpRPkM/NlPN aN0mwkUwP9Xotpplx5zbDeTO2w71rqjscNW4Fu1nYG+u5I6CO4TQZ7bsy6ODaOWqhRRT8O87CnHcu Nrfn0pf4TAG/ZVdpt/y+P12lYKj3PAwIoV3Gv5HnLLb/vyJUTvUC7hNJ8C4YEciA+uhPW3AtJvm08 ux6FxO7yrHkaR6GCjgksJiAX67F/djZEkWxkkS2qICAXBMTAKy0+A4qu04x/L9m5shjpyNqdxrH7Y bNyIHaLmdCg+Nnhjl7n1Ok+iTVwIYg2T95ivuJqD7bRx22qANb+36gdfbYf7IJVLKZgMz7wnFBQoY D7ItRp5RhzG+PMePDBFw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q1ttY-00ES9m-0j; Wed, 24 May 2023 19:11:36 +0000 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q1ttF-00ES5j-1A for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 24 May 2023 19:11:18 +0000 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 34OJAxne112230; Wed, 24 May 2023 14:10:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1684955459; bh=44ofO+fg5oAkQw3fphX2FkEvo3iqoYAXa6FicyN/lQ4=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=iIxusKymMCG6l23dWRsgMNIhzkYFVqno1SK3rkRxkd02fITtP8EReVDw3ka1YSaap j+7OWDwBEOazxFJ7AN3CHopww6t4c/ClqKGOrUNy6y2PGc7JlIOadVmGvZ768POjrg VFid4Lgyv4SLRLKKH3+Yf6jhxELKf2UQYXDTRrXA= Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (dlee113.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.24]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 34OJAwMv099824 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 24 May 2023 14:10:59 -0500 Received: from DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Wed, 24 May 2023 14:10:58 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 24 May 2023 14:10:58 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileaxei01-snat.itg.ti.com [10.180.69.5]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 34OJAwiM025082; Wed, 24 May 2023 14:10:58 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 14:10:58 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Andrew Davis CC: Francesco Dolcini , Vignesh Raghavendra , Francesco Dolcini , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: ti: add toradex,verdin-am62 et al. Message-ID: <20230524191058.fkvl255j6fjcm4m5@unabashed> References: <20230524143631.42471-1-francesco@dolcini.it> <20230524143631.42471-2-francesco@dolcini.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230524_121117_501699_A39F7816 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.70 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 12:48-20230524, Andrew Davis wrote: [..] > In fact I'm not sure we get much value at all out of top level whole-SoC compatible > strings. Maybe we did when there was matching in kernel to do device specific fixups, > but that isn't really used much in ARM64. If you are arguing about const: ti,am625 - there is a bunch more other S/w systems that use compatibles for various purposes in addition to usage in userspace (test systems etc) that benefit. Unless there is a ARM64 wide trend to drop it, I don't see a reason to have a discussion on that. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel