From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B67C611B
	for <patches@lists.linux.dev>; Sun, 28 May 2023 19:43:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D014C433EF;
	Sun, 28 May 2023 19:43:16 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org;
	s=korg; t=1685302996;
	bh=T91vhwxfKDt8nLzl/QL3jMmXr7RD7t3Ds6JFl4myVEA=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=tYcQYA19vX/Ui6XV4K/PbmlBTXxkZtJiqJdaKVqkKaarjp71sAbfk8PiZ/4hKnxSv
	 Mo08JhtYxI09KgdHrJMH8WkbYRF2nFpPcmEJO4grdZVTv7rx+f3kDgFJjCS48Zo7R1
	 fyMF6VJmY22cmtt5WtRgsuykTpSbQIR5GDJFY8EU=
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	patches@lists.linux.dev,
	Shuang Li <shuali@redhat.com>,
	Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>,
	Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 111/211] tipc: do not update mtu if msg_max is too small in mtu negotiation
Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 20:10:32 +0100
Message-Id: <20230528190846.329378083@linuxfoundation.org>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1
In-Reply-To: <20230528190843.514829708@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20230528190843.514829708@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.67
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev
List-Id: <patches.lists.linux.dev>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:patches+subscribe@lists.linux.dev>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:patches+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 56077b56cd3fb78e1c8619e29581ba25a5c55e86 ]

When doing link mtu negotiation, a malicious peer may send Activate msg
with a very small mtu, e.g. 4 in Shuang's testing, without checking for
the minimum mtu, l->mtu will be set to 4 in tipc_link_proto_rcv(), then
n->links[bearer_id].mtu is set to 4294967228, which is a overflow of
'4 - INT_H_SIZE - EMSG_OVERHEAD' in tipc_link_mss().

With tipc_link.mtu = 4, tipc_link_xmit() kept printing the warning:

 tipc: Too large msg, purging xmit list 1 5 0 40 4!
 tipc: Too large msg, purging xmit list 1 15 0 60 4!

And with tipc_link_entry.mtu 4294967228, a huge skb was allocated in
named_distribute(), and when purging it in tipc_link_xmit(), a crash
was even caused:

  general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x2100001011000dd: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
  CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.3.0.neta #19
  RIP: 0010:kfree_skb_list_reason+0x7e/0x1f0
  Call Trace:
   <IRQ>
   skb_release_data+0xf9/0x1d0
   kfree_skb_reason+0x40/0x100
   tipc_link_xmit+0x57a/0x740 [tipc]
   tipc_node_xmit+0x16c/0x5c0 [tipc]
   tipc_named_node_up+0x27f/0x2c0 [tipc]
   tipc_node_write_unlock+0x149/0x170 [tipc]
   tipc_rcv+0x608/0x740 [tipc]
   tipc_udp_recv+0xdc/0x1f0 [tipc]
   udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0x33e/0x620
   udp_unicast_rcv_skb.isra.72+0x75/0x90
   __udp4_lib_rcv+0x56d/0xc20
   ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x100/0x2d0

This patch fixes it by checking the new mtu against tipc_bearer_min_mtu(),
and not updating mtu if it is too small.

Fixes: ed193ece2649 ("tipc: simplify link mtu negotiation")
Reported-by: Shuang Li <shuali@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 net/tipc/link.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
index c1e56d1f21b38..dbb1bc722ba9b 100644
--- a/net/tipc/link.c
+++ b/net/tipc/link.c
@@ -2164,7 +2164,7 @@ static int tipc_link_proto_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	struct tipc_msg *hdr = buf_msg(skb);
 	struct tipc_gap_ack_blks *ga = NULL;
 	bool reply = msg_probe(hdr), retransmitted = false;
-	u32 dlen = msg_data_sz(hdr), glen = 0;
+	u32 dlen = msg_data_sz(hdr), glen = 0, msg_max;
 	u16 peers_snd_nxt =  msg_next_sent(hdr);
 	u16 peers_tol = msg_link_tolerance(hdr);
 	u16 peers_prio = msg_linkprio(hdr);
@@ -2203,6 +2203,9 @@ static int tipc_link_proto_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	switch (mtyp) {
 	case RESET_MSG:
 	case ACTIVATE_MSG:
+		msg_max = msg_max_pkt(hdr);
+		if (msg_max < tipc_bearer_min_mtu(l->net, l->bearer_id))
+			break;
 		/* Complete own link name with peer's interface name */
 		if_name =  strrchr(l->name, ':') + 1;
 		if (sizeof(l->name) - (if_name - l->name) <= TIPC_MAX_IF_NAME)
@@ -2247,8 +2250,8 @@ static int tipc_link_proto_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		l->peer_session = msg_session(hdr);
 		l->in_session = true;
 		l->peer_bearer_id = msg_bearer_id(hdr);
-		if (l->mtu > msg_max_pkt(hdr))
-			l->mtu = msg_max_pkt(hdr);
+		if (l->mtu > msg_max)
+			l->mtu = msg_max;
 		break;
 
 	case STATE_MSG:
-- 
2.39.2