All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, kuniyu@amazon.com, dh.herrmann@gmail.com,
	jhs@mojatatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/netlink: fix NETLINK_LIST_MEMBERSHIPS group array length check
Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 23:40:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230528234038.1d6de5cb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1be298c3-ce57-548e-e0af-937971fe58e9@mojatatu.com>

On Sat, 27 May 2023 12:01:25 -0300 Pedro Tammela wrote:
> On 27/05/2023 00:33, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 May 2023 11:46:09 -0300 Pedro Tammela wrote:  
> >> For the socket option 'NETLINK_LIST_MEMBERSHIPS' the length is defined
> >> as the number of u32 required to represent the whole bitset.  
> > 
> > I don't think it is, it's a getsockopt() len is in bytes.  
> 
> Unfortunately the man page seems to be ambiguous (Emphasis added):
> 	
>         NETLINK_LIST_MEMBERSHIPS (since Linux 4.2)
>                Retrieve all groups a socket is a member of.  optval is a
>                pointer to __u32 and *optlen is the size of the array*.  The
>                array is filled with the full membership set of the
>                socket, and the required array size is returned in optlen.
> 
> Size of the array in bytes? in __u32?

Indeed ambiguous, in C "size of array" could as well refer to sizeof()
or ARRAY_SIZE()..

> SystemD seems to be expecting the size in __u32 chunks:
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/9c9b9b89151c3e29f3665e306733957ee3979853/src/libsystemd/sd-netlink/netlink-socket.c#L37
> 
> But then looking into the getsockopt manpage we see (Ubuntu 23.04):
> 
>         int getsockopt(int sockfd, int level, int optname,
>                        void optval[restrict *.optlen],
>                        socklen_t *restrict optlen);
> 
> 
> So it seems like getsockopt() asks for optlen to be, in this case, __u32 
> chunks?

Why so?

> WDYT?
> 
> >   
> >> User space then usually queries the required size and issues a subsequent
> >> getsockopt call with the correct parameters[1].
> >>
> >> The current code has an unit mismatch between 'len' and 'pos', where
> >> 'len' is the number of u32 in the passed array while 'pos' is the
> >> number of bytes iterated in the groups bitset.
> >> For netlink groups greater than 32, which from a quick glance
> >> is a rare occasion, the mismatch causes the misreport of groups e.g.
> >> if a rtnl socket is a member of group 34, it's reported as not a member
> >> (all 0s).  
> > 
> > IDK... I haven't tried to repro but looking at the code the more
> > suspicious line of code is this one:
> > 
> > 		if (put_user(ALIGN(nlk->ngroups / 8, sizeof(u32)), optlen))
> > 
> > It's going to round down bytes, and I don't think it's intending to.
> > It should be DIV_ROUND_UP(, 8) then ALIGN(, 4) right?  
> 
> That indeed looks suspicious.
> Your suggestions looks correct for optlen reported as bytes.
> For optlen reported in __u32 chunks seems like BITS_TO_U32(nlk->ngroups) 
> would be sufficient.

I don't know of any other case where socklen_t would refer to something
else than bytes, I'm leaning towards addressing the truncation (and if
systemd thinks the value is in u32s potentially also fixing system, not
that over-allocating will hurt its correctness).

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-29  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-25 14:46 [PATCH net] net/netlink: fix NETLINK_LIST_MEMBERSHIPS group array length check Pedro Tammela
2023-05-26  9:26 ` Simon Horman
2023-05-27  3:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-27 15:01   ` Pedro Tammela
2023-05-29  6:40     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-05-29 14:37       ` Pedro Tammela

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230528234038.1d6de5cb@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pctammela@mojatatu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.