All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linan666@huaweicloud.com
To: song@kernel.org
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linan122@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
	houtao1@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] md/raid10: handle replacement devices in fix_read_error
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 01:32:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230623173236.2513554-4-linan666@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230623173236.2513554-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com>

From: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>

In fix_read_error(), the handling of replacement devices is missing. If
read replacement device errors, we will attempt to fix 'mirror->rdev'.
It is wrong. Get rdev from r10bio to ensure that the fixed device is the
one which read error occurred.

Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/md/raid10.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index a36e53fce21f..4a7c8eaf6ea0 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -2726,15 +2726,10 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10
 {
 	int sect = 0; /* Offset from r10_bio->sector */
 	int sectors = r10_bio->sectors, slot = r10_bio->read_slot;
-	struct md_rdev *rdev;
+	struct md_rdev *rdev = r10_bio->devs[slot].rdev;
 	int max_read_errors = atomic_read(&mddev->max_corr_read_errors);
 	int d = r10_bio->devs[slot].devnum;
 
-	/* still own a reference to this rdev, so it cannot
-	 * have been cleared recently.
-	 */
-	rdev = conf->mirrors[d].rdev;
-
 	if (test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
 		/* drive has already been failed, just ignore any
 		   more fix_read_error() attempts */
@@ -2763,12 +2758,11 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10
 			s = PAGE_SIZE >> 9;
 
 		rcu_read_lock();
+		rdev = r10_bio->devs[slot].rdev;
 		do {
 			sector_t first_bad;
 			int bad_sectors;
 
-			d = r10_bio->devs[sl].devnum;
-			rdev = rcu_dereference(conf->mirrors[d].rdev);
 			if (rdev &&
 			    test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) &&
 			    !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags) &&
@@ -2790,6 +2784,8 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10
 			sl++;
 			if (sl == conf->copies)
 				sl = 0;
+			d = r10_bio->devs[sl].devnum;
+			rdev = rcu_dereference(conf->mirrors[d].rdev);
 		} while (sl != slot);
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 
@@ -2798,9 +2794,7 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10
 			 * as bad on the first device to discourage future
 			 * reads.
 			 */
-			int dn = r10_bio->devs[slot].devnum;
-			rdev = conf->mirrors[dn].rdev;
-
+			rdev = r10_bio->devs[slot].rdev;
 			if (!rdev_set_badblocks(
 				    rdev,
 				    r10_bio->devs[slot].addr
@@ -2820,8 +2814,12 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10
 			if (sl==0)
 				sl = conf->copies;
 			sl--;
-			d = r10_bio->devs[sl].devnum;
-			rdev = rcu_dereference(conf->mirrors[d].rdev);
+			if (sl == slot) {
+				rdev = r10_bio->devs[slot].rdev;
+			} else {
+				d = r10_bio->devs[sl].devnum;
+				rdev = rcu_dereference(conf->mirrors[d].rdev);
+			}
 			if (!rdev ||
 			    test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags) ||
 			    !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags))
@@ -2854,8 +2852,12 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10
 			if (sl==0)
 				sl = conf->copies;
 			sl--;
-			d = r10_bio->devs[sl].devnum;
-			rdev = rcu_dereference(conf->mirrors[d].rdev);
+			if (sl == slot) {
+				rdev = r10_bio->devs[slot].rdev;
+			} else {
+				d = r10_bio->devs[sl].devnum;
+				rdev = rcu_dereference(conf->mirrors[d].rdev);
+			}
 			if (!rdev ||
 			    test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags) ||
 			    !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags))
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-23  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-23 17:32 [PATCH 0/3] md/raid10: optimize and fix read error linan666
2023-06-23  9:52 ` Paul Menzel
2023-06-25  1:23   ` Li Nan
2023-06-23 17:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] md/raid10: optimize fix_read_error linan666
2023-06-23 10:03   ` Paul Menzel
2023-06-25  6:44     ` Li Nan
2023-06-26  2:28   ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-23 17:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] md: remove redundant check in fix_read_error() linan666
2023-06-26  2:31   ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-23 17:32 ` linan666 [this message]
2023-06-26  2:42   ` [PATCH 3/3] md/raid10: handle replacement devices in fix_read_error Yu Kuai
2023-07-07  8:16 ` [PATCH 0/3] md/raid10: optimize and fix read error Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230623173236.2513554-4-linan666@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=linan666@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linan122@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.