All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] net/tls: Use tcp_read_sock() instead of ops->read_sock()
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 13:38:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230719113836.68859-5-hare@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230719113836.68859-1-hare@suse.de>

TLS resets the protocol operations, so the read_sock() callback might
be changed, too.
In this case using sock->ops->readsock() in tls_strp_read_copyin() will
enter an infinite recursion if the read_sock() callback is calling
tls_rx_rec_wait() which will call into sock->ops->readsock() via
tls_strp_read_copyin().
But as tls_strp_read_copyin() is supposed to produce data from the
consumed socket and that socket is always a TCP socket we can call
tcp_read_sock() directly without having to deal with callbacks.

Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
---
 net/tls/tls_strp.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_strp.c b/net/tls/tls_strp.c
index f37f4a0fcd3c..ca1e0e198ceb 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_strp.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_strp.c
@@ -369,7 +369,6 @@ static int tls_strp_copyin(read_descriptor_t *desc, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
 
 static int tls_strp_read_copyin(struct tls_strparser *strp)
 {
-	struct socket *sock = strp->sk->sk_socket;
 	read_descriptor_t desc;
 
 	desc.arg.data = strp;
@@ -377,7 +376,7 @@ static int tls_strp_read_copyin(struct tls_strparser *strp)
 	desc.count = 1; /* give more than one skb per call */
 
 	/* sk should be locked here, so okay to do read_sock */
-	sock->ops->read_sock(strp->sk, &desc, tls_strp_copyin);
+	tcp_read_sock(strp->sk, &desc, tls_strp_copyin);
 
 	return desc.error;
 }
-- 
2.35.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-19 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-19 11:38 [RESENT PATCHv7 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:38 ` [PATCH 1/6] net/tls: handle MSG_EOR for tls_sw TX flow Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:38 ` [PATCH 2/6] net/tls: handle MSG_EOR for tls_device " Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:38 ` [PATCH 3/6] selftests/net/tls: add test for MSG_EOR Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:38 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2023-07-19 11:54   ` [PATCH 4/6] net/tls: Use tcp_read_sock() instead of ops->read_sock() Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-19 11:38 ` [PATCH 5/6] net/tls: split tls_rx_reader_lock Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:55   ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-19 11:38 ` [PATCH 6/6] net/tls: implement ->read_sock() Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:55   ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-20 18:32   ` Simon Horman
2023-07-21  6:03     ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-21  3:02   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-21 13:53     ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-21 14:50       ` Jakub Kicinski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-07-26 19:15 [PATCHv9 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-26 19:15 ` [PATCH 4/6] net/tls: Use tcp_read_sock() instead of ops->read_sock() Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-21 14:35 [PATCHv8 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-21 14:35 ` [PATCH 4/6] net/tls: Use tcp_read_sock() instead of ops->read_sock() Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:19 [PATCHv7 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:19 ` [PATCH 4/6] net/tls: Use tcp_read_sock() instead of ops->read_sock() Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230719113836.68859-5-hare@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.