All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: GHES/AER synchronization missing?
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 17:57:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230901225755.GA90053@bhelgaas> (raw)

TL;DR: I think ghes_handle_aer() lacks synchronization with
aer_recover_work_func(), so aer_recover_work_func() may use estatus
data after it's been overwritten.

Sorry this is so long; it took me a long time to get this far, and I
might be in the weeds.  Here's the execution path I'm looking at:

  ghes_proc(struct ghes *ghes)
    estatus = ghes->estatus          # linux kernel buffer
    ghes_read_estatus(estatus, &buf_paddr)          # copy fw mem to estatus
    ghes_do_proc(estatus)
      apei_estatus_for_each_section(estatus, gdata)
        if (gdata is CPER_SEC_PCIE)
          ghes_handle_aer(gdata)     # pointer into estatus
            struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata)
            aer_recover_queue(..., pcie_err->aer_info)
              entry.regs = aer_regs  # pointer to struct aer_capability_regs
              kfifo_in(&aer_recover_ring, &entry)   # copy pointer into FIFO
  ...
  aer_recover_work_func
    kfifo_get(&aer_recover_ring, &entry)
    cper_print_aer(entry.regs)       # use aer_capability_regs values

I'm confused because I don't see what ensures that the
aer_capability_regs values, which I think are somewhere in the
ghes->estatus buffer, are preserved until aer_recover_work_func() is
finished with them.

Here's my understanding of the general flow:

  - hest_parse_ghes() adds a GHES platform device for each HEST Error
    Source descriptor of type 9 (Generic Hardware Error Source) or
    type 10 (Generic Hardware Error Source version 2).

  - Each HEST GHES entry has an Error Status Address that tells us
    about some range of firmware reserved memory that will contain
    error status data for the device.

  - ghes_probe() claims each GHES platform device.  It maps the Error
    Status Address once (so I guess the address of the firmware memory
    must be fixed for the life of the system?) and allocates a
    ghes->estatus buffer in kernel memory.

  - When the platform notifies OSPM of a GHES event, ghes_proc()
    copies error status data from the Error Status Address firmware
    memory to the ghes->estatus buffer.

  - The error status data may have multiple sections.  ghes_do_proc()
    iterates through each section in the ghes->estatus buffer.  PCIe
    sections contain a struct aer_capability_regs that has values of
    all the AER Capability registers, and ghes_handle_aer() passes a
    pointer to the struct aer_capability_regs to aer_recover_queue().

  - This struct aer_capability_regs pointer is a pointer into the
    ghes->estatus buffer.  aer_recover_queue() copies that pointer
    into the aer_recover_ring fifo and schedules
    aer_recover_work_func() for later execution.

  - aer_recover_work_func() reads the struct aer_capability_regs data
    at some future time.

  - ghes_proc() does not know when aer_recover_work_func() is finished
    with the struct aer_capability_regs data.

Am I missing a mechanism that prevents a second ghes_proc() invocation
from overwriting ghes->estatus before the first aer_recover_work_func()
is finished?

The ghes_defer_non_standard_event() case added by Shiju and James in
9aa9cf3ee945 ("ACPI / APEI: Add a notifier chain for unknown (vendor)
CPER records") also schedules future work, but it copies the data
needed for that work.  It seems like ghes_handle_aer() maybe should do
something similar?

Bjorn

                 reply	other threads:[~2023-09-01 22:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230901225755.GA90053@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.