All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thinker.li@gmail.com
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
	Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC bpf-next v3 00/11] Registrating struct_ops types from modules
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:59:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230920155923.151136-1-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)

From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>

Given the current constraints of the current implementation,
struct_ops cannot be registered dynamically. This presents a
significant limitation for modules like coming fuse-bpf, which seeks
to implement a new struct_ops type. To address this issue, a new API
is introduced that allows the registration of new struct_ops types
from modules.

Previously, struct_ops types were defined in bpf_struct_ops_types.h
and collected as a static array. The new API lets callers add new
struct_ops types dynamically. The static array has been removed and
replaced by the per-btf struct_ops_tab.

The struct_ops subsystem relies on BTF to determine the layout of
values in a struct_ops map and identify the subsystem that the
struct_ops map registers to. However, the kernel BTF does not include
the type information of struct_ops types defined by a module. The
struct_ops subsystem requires knowledge of the corresponding module
for a given struct_ops map and the utilization of BTF information from
that module. We empower libbpf to determine the correct module for
accessing the BTF information and pass an identity (FD) of the module
btf to the kernel. The kernel looks up type information and registered
struct_ops types directly from the given btf.

If a module exits while one or more struct_ops maps still refer to a
struct_ops type defined by the module, it can lead to unforeseen
complications. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that a module
remains intact as long as any struct_ops map is still linked to a
struct_ops type defined by the module. To achieve this, every
struct_ops map holds a reference to the module for each struct_ops
map.

Changes from v2:

 - Remove struct_ops array, and add a per-btf (module) struct_ops_tab
   to collect registered struct_ops types.

 - Validate value_type by checking member names and types.

---
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230913061449.1918219-1-thinker.li@gmail.com/

Kui-Feng Lee (11):
  bpf: refactory struct_ops type initialization to a function.
  bpf: add struct_ops_tab to btf.
  bpf: add register and unregister functions for struct_ops.
  bpf: attach a module BTF to a bpf_struct_ops
  bpf: hold module for bpf_struct_ops_map.
  bpf: validate value_type
  bpf, net: switch to storing struct_ops in btf
  bpf: pass attached BTF to find correct type info of struct_ops progs.
  libbpf: Find correct module BTFs for struct_ops maps and progs.
  bpf: export btf_ctx_access to modules.
  selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops().

 include/linux/bpf.h                           |  15 +-
 include/linux/btf.h                           |  36 ++
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |   4 +
 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c                   | 378 ++++++++++++------
 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops_types.h             |  12 -
 kernel/bpf/btf.c                              |  87 +++-
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          |   2 +-
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         |   4 +-
 net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c                |  12 +-
 net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c                         |  20 +-
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |   4 +
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c                           |   3 +-
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h                           |   4 +-
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        | 121 +++---
 .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   |  63 +++
 .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h   |   5 +
 .../bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c   |  43 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c   |  30 ++
 18 files changed, 638 insertions(+), 205 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops_types.h
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c

-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-09-20 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-20 15:59 thinker.li [this message]
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 01/11] bpf: refactory struct_ops type initialization to a function thinker.li
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 02/11] bpf: add struct_ops_tab to btf thinker.li
2023-09-25 21:10   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-25 21:45     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 03/11] bpf: add register and unregister functions for struct_ops thinker.li
2023-09-25 23:07   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-25 23:13     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-25 23:31   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-26  0:19     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 04/11] bpf: attach a module BTF to a bpf_struct_ops thinker.li
2023-09-25 22:57   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-25 23:25     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 05/11] bpf: hold module for bpf_struct_ops_map thinker.li
2023-09-25 23:23   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-25 23:42     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 06/11] bpf: validate value_type thinker.li
2023-09-26  1:03   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-27 20:27     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 07/11] bpf, net: switch to storing struct_ops in btf thinker.li
2023-09-20 23:45   ` kernel test robot
2023-09-24  3:23   ` kernel test robot
2023-09-25  8:30   ` kernel test robot
2023-09-26  0:02   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-26  0:18     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 08/11] bpf: pass attached BTF to find correct type info of struct_ops progs thinker.li
2023-09-25 22:58   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-09-25 23:50     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-26  0:24   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-26  0:58     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 09/11] libbpf: Find correct module BTFs for struct_ops maps and progs thinker.li
2023-09-25 23:09   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-09-26  0:12     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 10/11] bpf: export btf_ctx_access to modules thinker.li
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 11/11] selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops() thinker.li
2023-09-26  1:19   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-26  1:33 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 00/11] Registrating struct_ops types from modules Martin KaFai Lau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230920155923.151136-1-thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.