All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] btrfs: pick device with lowest devt for show_devname
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 15:42:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231120144224.GL11264@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5a58903-b6c8-4cfd-9328-ea8214ca3399@oracle.com>

On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 06:55:51AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> On 11/3/23 04:26, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 07:10:48PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> >> In a non-single-device Btrfs filesystem, if Btrfs is already mounted and
> >> if you run the command 'mount -a,' it will fail and the command
> >> 'umount <device>' also fails. As below:
> >>
> >> ----------------
> >> $ cat /etc/fstab | grep btrfs
> >> UUID=12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc /btrfs btrfs defaults,nofail 0 0
> >>
> >> $ mkfs.btrfs -qf --uuid 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc /dev/sda2 /dev/sda1
> >> $ mount --verbose -a
> >> /                        : ignored
> >> /btrfs                   : successfully mounted
> >>
> >> $ ls -l /dev/disk/by-uuid | grep 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc
> >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Nov  2 17:43 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc -> ../../sda1
> >>
> >> $ cat /proc/self/mounts | grep btrfs
> >> /dev/sda2 /btrfs btrfs rw,relatime,space_cache=v2,subvolid=5,subvol=/ 0 0
> >>
> >> $ findmnt --df /btrfs
> >> SOURCE    FSTYPE SIZE  USED AVAIL USE% TARGET
> >> /dev/sda2 btrfs    2G  5.8M  1.8G   0% /btrfs
> >>
> >> $ mount --verbose -a
> >> /                        : ignored
> >> mount: /btrfs: /dev/sda1 already mounted or mount point busy.
> >> $echo $?
> >> 32
> >>
> >> $ umount /dev/sda1
> >> umount: /dev/sda1: not mounted.
> >> $ echo $?
> >> 32
> >> ----------------
> >>
> >> I assume (RFC) this is because '/dev/disk/by-uuid,' '/proc/self/mounts,'
> >> and 'findmnt' do not all reference the same device, resulting in the
> >> 'mount -a' and 'umount' failures. However, an empirically found solution
> >> is to align them using a rule, such as the disk with the lowest 'devt,'
> >> for a multi-device Btrfs filesystem.
> >>
> >> I'm not yet sure (RFC) how to create a udev rule to point to the disk with
> >> the lowest 'devt,' as this kernel patch does, and I believe it is
> >> possible.
> >>
> >> And this would ensure that '/proc/self/mounts,' 'findmnt,' and
> >> '/dev/disk/by-uuid' all reference the same device.
> >>
> >> After applying this patch, the above test passes. Unfortunately,
> >> /dev/disk/by-uuid also points to the lowest 'devt' by chance, even though
> >> no rule has been set as of now. As shown below.
> > 
> > Does this mean the devid of the device shown in /proc/self/mount won't
> > be the lowest? Here the devid is the logical device number, while devt
> > is some internal identifier or at least not something I'd consider a
> > good identifier from user perspective.
> > 
> > The lowest devid has been there for a long time so I'd consider this as
> > behaviour change which can potentially break things.
> 
> It's not the lowest devid, but rather the latest_bdev since commit
> 6605fd2f394b ('btrfs: use latest_dev in btrfs_show_devname').
> 
> We need a rule for choosing a device in a multi-device filesystem that
> works both inside and outside the kernel. The major-minor (devt) is the
> only consistent option.

I'm not sure how users interpret the device path in the proc/mounts
output so changing that can potentially break something. OTOH if the
device hasn't been always the lowest one (i.e. no assumptions because of
the mentioned commit), then we can use the devt.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-20 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-02 11:10 [PATCH RFC] btrfs: pick device with lowest devt for show_devname Anand Jain
2023-11-02 20:26 ` David Sterba
2023-11-02 22:55   ` Anand Jain
2023-11-20 14:42     ` David Sterba [this message]
2023-11-24 16:19 ` David Sterba
2023-11-25  1:09   ` Anand Jain
2023-11-27 11:48     ` Anand Jain
2023-11-28  8:00       ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2023-11-28 23:28         ` Anand Jain
2023-11-29 13:38           ` Andrei Borzenkov
2023-11-29 20:54           ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2023-12-05 17:44             ` David Sterba
2023-12-06 19:52               ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2023-12-05 17:43         ` David Sterba
2023-11-29 21:20 ` Goffredo Baroncelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231120144224.GL11264@twin.jikos.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.