From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCE2412B9B for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706265864; cv=none; b=hiTm5w+nBBx6H72ZxIHWXLdRXYiHPriF8xGGL8DbXQhLDFy8LhKSyuZR+EnwK4RSvLKgsDx6ISiwNUsZepYyx5D04yjvx9yLecZQAJpO1RjehqPX4+sdT0luE23IiyCLfAXcdEcD/t93PwfSxi5Q9z0ernSLsx+eRzubLgImWCE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706265864; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KDwKvxjFBtCGcBHvMr/jFLU0CTemadUlZgy031SYquI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=J3ykt2N/ctc8jOuWlkOeX6pvAgt7ivum+tSlSprWsGMQTLIVTE/UhsUBO2BiU/mO2CHlqLB8RnayT3ulGhL76h6tqQSTQEHWodh5J+mpRPYHALLxY1Ng7ZfnX8jI/q1YGHOr9PTzpzQ16IJgU+i8cHrLeRO+/PTKCI0PBhZPHjY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=VDa/Niud; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="VDa/Niud" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1706265855; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fEWqYXcFpyH0h2J3JzWjNyw0EkIiJEepfjoSL7blk4o=; b=VDa/NiudPX2J/KcbP8a1tvZ6Mq62L1qp0DDCqyTk+4BG0qxNObrgjufvyFs0fWqfF+4a5H 8jE2HRVezmMSV30OVXLVkR2kTew6zfgKFwgkJz+nrS7vbQZOGKaId8s5Ss4FG4M/s2QLi9 E32q/NuO70QOby5C9YTamIWUsXOpFWs= Received: from mail-lf1-f72.google.com (mail-lf1-f72.google.com [209.85.167.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-621-dC84CTaiOEyNyRb3Dhkhbw-1; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 05:44:10 -0500 X-MC-Unique: dC84CTaiOEyNyRb3Dhkhbw-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5101ebb72c8so196886e87.2 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 02:44:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706265848; x=1706870648; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=fEWqYXcFpyH0h2J3JzWjNyw0EkIiJEepfjoSL7blk4o=; b=iebZTyrCgyF8GGXREB+utgrXVgXcTdYzY/ibAmJVT+QLPXUp6GI0xKmGmzyb8GDnuR SjTK2Acjc74fqY97a9c1iDSd6KeesKgX9iQPIS8qlAHuZX3LQd2YgecDwXe+05akOzGF QMANjl5a0ZdXw062kNGnwNM50jA8PU9CuWte7GcXG55CkxKpMPJMOJc0L4q1cXx25OcL dt6+uYu3s6L4v20cuqG68x6WfhOWb0QXPWVdE5xWVga9DphRp6i+RHwCfmX7Xg1x9aci jyiSeX5WtLLcN4WagFZYAI31MqgIXO0MdQSTV/SLF9owi3gZJ2OwdcOI0MYjbIV/vGL7 jxwA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwexFzV/ELEDUQpKXl5hD7PFmGxqqbpSKieJlnt/75Vq5en3H+f GqHe4lW2C0N0MjYD7iBc5QLn4yOwZyhx5V108uRyudrQEDyotW7PJMOqj/xTubjkRbFtb3o7nay 0ssOCagfDmpxeIfkMEtZ8aJTNv2G153tnQDhtq1rf1hoNwSGP0rtJvq1dsdX3ltM= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4564:0:b0:510:1023:784d with SMTP id k4-20020ac24564000000b005101023784dmr574331lfm.81.1706265847911; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 02:44:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFLz0ct9zFeeITjNYcc+4b79PuevNDGcLbg6XkBVWisv//4gW2d8624fgOAcbVF9MSADDq+dA== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4564:0:b0:510:1023:784d with SMTP id k4-20020ac24564000000b005101023784dmr574307lfm.81.1706265846018; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 02:44:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2a02:8308:b104:2c00:7718:da55:8b6:8dcc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d19-20020ac24c93000000b0051025dcd3e0sm139616lfl.69.2024.01.26.02.44.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 26 Jan 2024 02:44:05 -0800 (PST) From: Ondrej Mosnacek To: Paul Moore Cc: Stephen Smalley , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] security: fix the logic in security_inode_getsecctx() Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:44:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20240126104403.1040692-1-omosnace@redhat.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: selinux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The inode_getsecctx LSM hook has previously been corrected to have -EOPNOTSUPP instead of 0 as the default return value to fix BPF LSM behavior. However, the call_int_hook()-generated loop in security_inode_getsecctx() was left treating 0 as the neutral value, so after an LSM returns 0, the loop continues to try other LSMs, and if one of them returns a non-zero value, the function immediately returns with said value. So in a situation where SELinux and the BPF LSMs registered this hook, -EOPNOTSUPP would be incorrectly returned whenever SELinux returned 0. Fix this by open-coding the call_int_hook() loop and making it use the correct LSM_RET_DEFAULT() value as the neutral one, similar to what other hooks do. Reported-by: Stephen Smalley Link: https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/CAEjxPJ4ev-pasUwGx48fDhnmjBnq_Wh90jYPwRQRAqXxmOKD4Q@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: b36995b8609a ("lsm: fix default return value for inode_getsecctx") Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek --- I ran 'tools/nfs.sh' on the patch and even though it fixes the most serious issue that Stephen reported, some of the tests are still failing under NFS (but I will presume that these are pre-existing issues not caused by the patch). I can also see an opportunity to clean up the hook implementations in security/security.c - I plan to have a go at it and send it as a separate patch later. security/security.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index 0144a98d3712..6196ccaba433 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -4255,7 +4255,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_setsecctx); */ int security_inode_getsecctx(struct inode *inode, void **ctx, u32 *ctxlen) { - return call_int_hook(inode_getsecctx, -EOPNOTSUPP, inode, ctx, ctxlen); + struct security_hook_list *hp; + int rc; + + /* + * Only one module will provide a security context. + */ + hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.inode_getsecctx, list) { + rc = hp->hook.inode_getsecctx(inode, ctx, ctxlen); + if (rc != LSM_RET_DEFAULT(inode_getsecctx)) + return rc; + } + + return LSM_RET_DEFAULT(inode_getsecctx); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_getsecctx); -- 2.43.0