All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:06:56 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240222100656.0a644254@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 754 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the perf tree, today's linux-next build (native perf)
failed like this:

util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:15: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'struct timespec64'
        __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
                     ^     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:29: note: forward declaration of 'struct timespec64'
        __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
                                   ^

Caused by commit

  29d16de26df1 ("perf augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf: Move 'struct timespec64' to vmlinux.h")

This is a ppc64 le build.

I have used the perf tree from next-20240221 for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2024-02-21 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-21 23:06 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2024-02-23 19:50 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-02-23 20:11   ` [solved] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-02-23 20:34     ` Namhyung Kim
2024-02-24 15:05       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-01 22:41 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-02 20:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-12 15:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-13  2:43   ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-21 21:41 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-21 23:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-21 23:19   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-21 23:32     ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-22  2:13       ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-22 14:32         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-21 23:36   ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-21 23:40     ` arnaldo.melo
2024-03-21 23:48     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-02-06 23:40 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-07  0:02 ` Ian Rogers
2023-10-24 23:26 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-25  0:34 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-05-29 23:05 Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-30  2:16 ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-16 22:50 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-16 23:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-16 23:55   ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-17  3:23     ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-21 21:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-22 18:37   ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-22 22:54     ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-23 13:27       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-27 20:31         ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-28  1:33         ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-28 19:47           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-28 23:06             ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-29 12:28               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-04-03  5:15                 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-08-30 22:34 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-01  5:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-06 19:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-07  2:31   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-07  3:00     ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-07  4:22       ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 15:21         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-07-20 23:05 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-21  2:35 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-21  3:55   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-21  5:33     ` Ian Rogers
2022-01-05 22:19 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-07  8:58 ` kajoljain
2022-01-11 21:45   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-11 22:01     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-12  5:30       ` kajoljain
2022-01-12  6:16       ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14 12:03       ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240222100656.0a644254@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.