From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2033112CD98 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:17:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711545436; cv=none; b=khI5BrbFeHuIMJEXsSNV36lq/A2GmdWfB/f5GjV9Zwsl4Plg1kjSo8cWfKef3vfrKznMaje3N804464neJ0ws/yA7XoxNyR+4/72GiD+DqO+sw2n4V24kzBmDf5bW3eiNjcDNvnXhp77311Q5z0vFmGWDQJ4SytNP0/GybTe1TE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711545436; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EgGwsr1jWaZ3/tn3jhVBCdIu5Zv7AE9Le1ze+dVFpKM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SWwEnOC7PhUBsS1v/5fw/Y1Kq7BBvDbYgAY8PBaSmsJwi7io1pi2eQ/oKIhtte8MPYxwEitKS3Dbe83gIlJ/DF3v+sXj0KXEVNxmp479vrB2xcFXC4hdlkg2JTFMq8UB7u9/cQ9cBLpp+4qASJSSOxReliM6zE/OpLAMub2hgmE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hZa5clA5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hZa5clA5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC207C433C7; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:17:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1711545436; bh=EgGwsr1jWaZ3/tn3jhVBCdIu5Zv7AE9Le1ze+dVFpKM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hZa5clA5oSe9ER3hZCEFG65OMupx2BoQMqS7RixS7YRWiYLXCJw5Go90/s3nH0J/k TRaQsFCOzU826/qMteSuzE7B2U2SzuljYSlQYT2x86ur9XbNAh26Gi7UsDZ2DyRIxb t8fvOanIcy475vfiYNUPDVdGYdD49BLFDKObRxoOUjICTJCNvkNnQP+tHLMIpNWmDQ f8thN/h/4DFNYkDSX2QFtfqvZCjbEow+AIIUmB57/NfWawfuq8iW1FEd5NDwk1T85S QgAkpAQz5kjUoZNpY1WKj6u2wLxB91EEY5VsRyHrDBWOkNmoDBULiJ3RPxDRdR11pZ Pvxf5RX7sxBFA== Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:17:11 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Mateusz K , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mfd: intel-lpss: Switch over to MSI interrupts Message-ID: <20240327131711.GR13211@google.com> References: <20240312165905.1764507-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240325211915.GA1449994@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Tue, 26 Mar 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 04:41:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 11:06:38AM +0100, Mateusz K wrote: > > > I tried the patch that changes PCI_IRQ_LEGACY into PCI_IRQ_ALL_TYPES > > > and it seems I get some other error now > > > > > > [ 1.477341] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.0: enabling device (0004 -> 0006) > > > [ 1.477466] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A > > > [ 1.477468] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.0: PCI INT A: not connected > > > [ 1.477488] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.0: probe with driver intel-lpss > > > failed with error -2147483648 > > > [ 1.489572] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.2: enabling device (0004 -> 0006) > > > [ 1.489688] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.2: can't derive routing for PCI INT C > > > [ 1.489689] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.2: PCI INT C: not connected > > > [ 1.489715] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.2: probe with driver intel-lpss > > > failed with error -2147483648 > > > [ 1.501886] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.0: enabling device (0004 -> 0006) > > > [ 1.502034] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A > > > [ 1.502036] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.0: PCI INT A: not connected > > > [ 1.502067] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.0: probe with driver intel-lpss > > > failed with error -2147483648 > > > [ 1.514288] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.1: enabling device (0004 -> 0006) > > > [ 1.514535] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.1: can't derive routing for PCI INT B > > > [ 1.514538] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.1: PCI INT B: not connected > > > [ 1.514570] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.1: probe with driver intel-lpss > > > failed with error -2147483648 > > > [ 1.526291] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.0: enabling device (0004 -> 0006) > > > [ 1.526555] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A > > > [ 1.526557] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.0: PCI INT A: not connected > > > [ 1.526604] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.0: probe with driver intel-lpss > > > failed with error -2147483648 > > > [ 1.538130] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.3: enabling device (0004 -> 0006) > > > [ 1.538233] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.3: can't derive routing for PCI INT D > > > [ 1.538235] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.3: PCI INT D: not connected > > > [ 1.538253] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.3: probe with driver intel-lpss > > > failed with error -2147483648 > > > > Hmm... I have a unique board to test :-) > > Let's revert it then. > > > > Bjorn, in such case your tree should keep conversion one. > > > > Lee, do you prefer a revert or can you simply drop this from the queue? > > Hold on, but IIUC this is the report about new hardware that never had > a support by Linux before. So a revert is no longer required? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]