From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEF7154773 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711642895; cv=none; b=MCS21OoKpOFI/w6937RJUnX7gTzYI4ahMhvAX76LieEqRKI5vqoGJPL9CDoRZw59VgQAVjvUoLIv6ajgAGaLXuud0+rKaL8AEWgURJiMFBtdWnFhyjqnAOdgx7C3ny3ASBCj6WKrWS6n2rlZszwM40CASP2qAINdCAyHSOLAMWI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711642895; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZGbWzrmV77/4nkqUKgQSxwPGvhVeKblIbHnt9BHMivc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZOgp1r06SkJP7/ER1+D8EX0xRo9lWd5z9Wcu98EQd0ouJEz9m2zhr7ftY6CvJG5psk6quzrOz6lrm1YK5Wqyw0H9Io0qM+iDzDHxy88fsSb0zuNEDuzEZ9j9kWVzRcVbHwD3EVsRGZTwJwxW/uRhwkhMtPMGCEA/bDmLx3y3qK4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=iGgb4xOC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="iGgb4xOC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC398C433C7; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:21:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1711642894; bh=ZGbWzrmV77/4nkqUKgQSxwPGvhVeKblIbHnt9BHMivc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iGgb4xOCqgtukj4SvN0SvbuPt6ebsDT89RN0tgOANCThRD2IS3TrwtBiktza/Z6hK BwDEJWXz/XFdFAPLnQKjm4ve0UOYLnwTkw44AFt9N7KhoGVOdKFIbgn2JoMeGoecUV MQgW8f+dtSgPdjfBq27bFw3fiwxHwT1zJiTgEqEqCQynkKixrX3+O1BAlCxPXRO22/ YN8RknCtjM+c5GIwJ6XRpQwJvWP281VRa3xbUDtv83uPG92EgxSC9EMt9x7FBMznx9 HQch84txvTyM5y5Ld/rYHLgclaIgFR4OHdjNVsIpxuNVAkcl2JuaFA01TJDL+GOjjD Y1TqMw+3zNlkA== Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 09:21:32 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Simon Horman Cc: Tariq Toukan , "David S. Miller" , Paolo Abeni , Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed , Gal Pressman , Leon Romanovsky , Carolina Jubran , Aya Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/8] net/mlx5e: Expose the VF/SF RX drop counter on the representor Message-ID: <20240328092132.47877242@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240328111831.GA403975@kernel.org> References: <20240326222022.27926-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> <20240326222022.27926-6-tariqt@nvidia.com> <20240328111831.GA403975@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 11:18:31 +0000 Simon Horman wrote: > > The "rx_vport_out_of_buffer" equals the sum of all > > Q counters out_of_buffer values allocated on the VF/SF. > > Hi Carolina and Tariq, > > I am wondering if any consideration was given to making this > a generic counter. Buffer exhaustion sounds like something that > other NICs may report too. I think it's basically rx_missed_errors from rtnl_link_stats64. mlx5 doesn't currently report it at all, AFAICT.