From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] libxl: introduce libxl__alloc_vdev Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:24:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20347.2076.974553.319109@mariner.uk.xensource.com> References: <1332856772-30292-5-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <20337.63133.683848.208682@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20341.49280.31751.307404@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20345.53429.51575.373166@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20346.63616.101912.260089@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/6] libxl: introduce libxl__alloc_vdev"): ... > I don't think it is worth adding one more option for something like > this: nobody should be using this option anyway. I am still unconvinced > there is a valid use case for this. I think it's important. An additional config option is IMO necessary to allow the admin to impose their vbd allocation strategy. > > That would be good. If you felt like documenting the Linux behaviour > > properly that would be good. The section "Notes on Linux as a guest" > > in docs/misc/vbd-interface.text. > > the best place for this would be in the Linux Documentation OK... Ian.