From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752408AbbLIAph (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:45:37 -0500
Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:52333 "HELO
	v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with SMTP id S1751967AbbLIApg (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:45:36 -0500
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: nm@ti.com, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
        linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] PM / OPP: Parse 'opp-supported-hw' binding
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 02:15:34 +0100
Message-ID: <2045944.Vz6xdAI2RM@vostro.rjw.lan>
User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/4.1.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20151208163126.GK3692@ubuntu>
References: <cover.1447904566.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <11600297.d0Q68hRS80@vostro.rjw.lan> <20151208163126.GK3692@ubuntu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tuesday, December 08, 2015 10:01:26 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 08-12-15, 17:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > I don't remember that code clearly and it would take some time for me to
> > recall it and then figure out the details about the changes.  Not impossible,
> > but quite honestly I have other things to spend that time on.
> > 
> > Also, are the patches so urgent that they really can't wait for Stephen to get
> > back?  I'd really prefer the discussion between you guys to settle without my
> > intervention.
> 
> I am talking only about two patches, which are required to base other
> work that Lee would be doing. I will resend the patches with all the
> details in them. If Stephen finds something wrong about them, we can
> get that fixed later as well.

If there are only the two patches, why don't you ask Lee to include them
into the series he's working on?  The dependency would be clear then too.

Thanks,
Rafael