From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH] xl: rename "list-vm" command to "vm-list" Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:08:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20460.29531.933964.18000@mariner.uk.xensource.com> References: <5b1ed71c74d675866513.1340870362@kaos-source-31003.sea31.amazon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5b1ed71c74d675866513.1340870362@kaos-source-31003.sea31.amazon.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Matt Wilson Cc: Ian Campbell , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Matt Wilson writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xl: rename "list-vm" command to "vm-list""): > diff -r 32034d1914a6 -r 5b1ed71c74d6 docs/man/xl.pod.1 > --- a/docs/man/xl.pod.1 Thu Jun 07 19:46:57 2012 +0100 > +++ b/docs/man/xl.pod.1 Thu Jun 28 06:34:26 2012 +0000 > @@ -617,6 +617,18 @@ different run state is appropriate. Pin > this, by ensuring certain VCPUs can only run on certain physical > CPUs. > > +=item B > + > +Prints information about all domains except for dom0. Doesn't it also exclude dm stubdoms, service domains (stub xenstored), etc. ? IMO it should, and the docs should say so. If it doesn't then that's IMO a bug but stubdoms are a bit buggy anyway so I don't regard fixing that as a blocker for this patch. But I think we should introduce docs that are correct. If you and Ian agree, perhaps you'd like to clarify that (and perhaps change the usage message too). Thanks, Ian.