From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Security vulnerability process,
 and CVE-2012-0217 [vote?]
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 17:38:03 +0100
Message-ID: <20585.50923.886126.938976@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
References: <20448.49637.38489.246434@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<1345718230.12501.79.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
	<50604343.1090506@xen.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <50604343.1090506@xen.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: lars.kurth@xen.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Lars Kurth writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Security vulnerability process, and CVE-2012-0217 [vote?]"):
> Does anybody have any objections to Ian's changes in this patch series? 
> None of these appear significant changes. In line with the decision 
> making process, I would be happy to apply. But, I am also happy to run 
> this through a vote.

They all seem uncontroversial to me and no-one has objected.  You
should go ahead and make the changes, I think.

Ian.