From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: ABI change request for adding new field in rte_pci_id structure Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:34:35 +0100 Message-ID: <2067679.D9WUs46Auu@xps13> References: <1453689419-237252-1-git-send-email-ziye.yang@intel.com> <1455596119-4613-1-git-send-email-ziye.yang@intel.com> <20160216101152.GA24596@bricha3-MOBL3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: Ziye Yang , dev@dpdk.org To: Bruce Richardson Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603BF2E81 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:36:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id g62so145758892wme.0 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:36:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160216101152.GA24596@bricha3-MOBL3> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-02-16 10:11, Bruce Richardson: > Thomas, is there some reason why the deprecation notices are not called out in > the release notes for a new release? Why are they kept separately? No strong reason. It is part of the release notes but not in the versioned section. Probably because there is no interest in keeping the history of planned deprecations in the release notes. When the API/ABI is changed, the deprecation notice is replaced by an entry in the versioned section.