From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA24E0059B for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:37:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2012 09:37:18 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="107794130" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.123.18]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2012 09:37:17 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:37:16 +0000 Message-ID: <2093088.34teMOhS0z@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.0 (Linux/3.0.0-15-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.0; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <4F323C52.8030304@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Wold, Saul" , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: Upstream-Status finally @ 100% X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:37:18 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 08 February 2012 09:34:56 Osier-mixon, Jeffrey wrote: > This sounds fantastic, and I'd love to create a page on the website > reflecting this. Just so I am clear, what exactly is this 100% of? Do we > have no local patches to upstream projects at all? Not quite - we still have most of the patches, it's just we've now declared on each and every one whether it can be/has been upstreamed. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RvBa7-0004N0-01 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:45:23 +0100 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2012 09:37:18 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="107794130" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.123.18]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2012 09:37:17 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:37:16 +0000 Message-ID: <2093088.34teMOhS0z@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.0 (Linux/3.0.0-15-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.0; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <4F323C52.8030304@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Wold, Saul" , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer , "Stewart, David C" , "Osier-mixon, Jeffrey" Subject: Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100% X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:45:23 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 08 February 2012 09:34:56 Osier-mixon, Jeffrey wrote: > This sounds fantastic, and I'd love to create a page on the website > reflecting this. Just so I am clear, what exactly is this 100% of? Do we > have no local patches to upstream projects at all? Not quite - we still have most of the patches, it's just we've now declared on each and every one whether it can be/has been upstreamed. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre