All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
To: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: device delete, error removing device
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:46:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20E50CC9-765A-443F-B797-0A52AC8C713F@colorremedies.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121022195002.GB25498@carfax.org.uk>


On Oct 22, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk> wrote:
> 
>   Yes, the automatic single -> RAID-0 upgrade was fixed. If you
> haven't run a balance on (at least) the metadata after adding the new
> device, then you won't get the DUP -> RAID-1 upgrade on metadata. (I
> can tell you haven't run the balance, because you still have the empty
> single metadata chunk).

I think it will be common for a balance of either type to not occur to most users. So if there's a way to automatically get a metadata only balance, such that metadata goes from dup to raid1, that would be nice.


>> What is the likelihood of a mkfs.btrfs 2+ device change in the
>> default data profile from raid0 to single?
> 
>   Non-zero. I think it mostly just wants someone to write the patch,
> and then beat off any resulting bikeshedding. :)

I'm curious of the negatives of -d single by default. Maybe this warrants a separate thread for discussion? As for the ensuing input for additional features once going down that path, the only one I'm coming up with is already mentioned above. Simple make options or additional steps go away for "most" people - whoever they are.

Chris Murphy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-22 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-22  4:32 device delete, error removing device Chris Murphy
2012-10-22  5:04 ` dima
2012-10-22  5:30   ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-22  6:02 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-22  9:19   ` Hugo Mills
2012-10-22 16:42     ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-22 17:04       ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-22 19:36         ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-22 19:50           ` Hugo Mills
2012-10-22 20:35             ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-22 20:46             ` Chris Murphy [this message]
2012-10-22 17:18       ` Hugo Mills
2012-10-23  7:57         ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-23 18:10           ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-23 18:17             ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-23 19:02               ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-23 20:28                 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-23 22:16                   ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-23 22:29                     ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-24 18:06                       ` device delete, error removing device [SOLVED] Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-24 19:13                         ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-24 21:30                           ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-24 21:43                             ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-25 19:26                               ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-27 18:25                                 ` device delete, error removing device Chris Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20E50CC9-765A-443F-B797-0A52AC8C713F@colorremedies.com \
    --to=lists@colorremedies.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.