From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935618AbcJUSu1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:50:27 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:63461 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934815AbcJUSuY (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:50:24 -0400 Subject: Re: Hexagon-setup: Combine four seq_printf() calls into one call in show_cpuinfo() To: "Theodore Ts'o" , Julia Lawall References: <20161021154624.maiwbgjmzlzhin2l@thunk.org> <48d54097-6be3-d39d-2af9-d4ad90c3c417@users.sourceforge.net> <20161021175317.nnb2keq7m3phwgbv@thunk.org> Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Richard Kuo , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <20c77dde-a1a0-8383-f344-a6f788af68d9@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 20:50:11 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161021175317.nnb2keq7m3phwgbv@thunk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:PxeuT22UClI5J68ZCFOWxAPJPuf4hdOE6Rtj5LrHMpsj4kAg75z vW4cP8C/ZRKr02oa3guW+H/ybtc1LYYz/eMtTcS69pOIhGtCfw08/Fbj6KUEtXsgrKdlvio 4CkHBrxiyKgrdn9+K06i8LoTHxAESuKi4CrLpBAYfQIn43hnHn3yA6Zol79ZCpd82lkDMnK S8d8AC24kijJ5soMudeGw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:6QQGeVpXPm8=:Vin991HLgjhC10m0qKOV1b 4w7Mgg9aC2FttHZPbC2uDG8vcM/qPBJ7Qmj5hsSd6KLyRoYA85dZDj+AN3iuud2w14V4g3hvy kTW4qozpH9BdQktA0HPYvUBNwDECXUrjNhx9cCa7V4825/kGTMLTTax9EUIUMdqyP6qUiplxB QHaA2NUYWdlTtKG/T91E+LsEvZcI02bDNhA5pC1R93BkJvyxiSPmVSkvCxLRJcpAGbq4Wyp6G wOa51wkJHCCLgPgV6oipSS4hOrVuN+pZk7Hx3xnltMS36TP5kwcYL6uVEakU19q3oOZh8gbo/ uOEzpF/3OnTkgESziej+RZLSwzgcoAOlJcbIgj6reLSjorS534etWSSNpmX2JNH7wuA9IWZk4 E0qwhkg782to6Q/w08QckAKluiilL0o12Ox8BH0TkL7lMtQJ/By7sGBZD055CLtprXRvwHzNr 4NZsxHJqUYsIq9gRE2GXKX5/KQGNdwq1kLETRuN6Go26NhdCBg5U+ePfQBMRh6dN6Zev4XWcm SDgFjtE3OQVcRzK0TrysGSpfYRYYBvwDiLzHa6C+Sgn33ZqsXj3XEpr6SwEMMEohPGEP686V0 OI77I8do2r+iYRU0b5l7Mrw9TEB3zU0F9ZqeqImI0y3XwzWH/o/VHB6hb/ZtDWmKGH7HWWQPS dbGQhNS1mNmDbfYESeZgo0p+o1O9hmSxHJlG+rbOMehQoFx8mIpWIKyj4yRbvXkfZasfP29HM Wu+ZJgv8wirRSyKggkdrzTtiQ3n7+2fiL45D5XzCrWvy1uHzJhyVtMqziI8+X+ZFDoaAMasYR C00ih2z Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > When the author of the semantic patch language is telling you to stand down, The collaboration evolved between Julia and me during the years somehow. Different software development opinions occur then as usual. Further opinions from contributors like you can eventually show variations between disagreement and acceptance. > and you still want to try to argue for blind application of patches, I guess that we have got different views about "blind" tries. > we have a really big problem. I hope that potential communication difficulties can still be resolved. > Especially when some of your patches have actually introduced bugs. I assume that these incidents could be clarified further, couldn't they? Regards, Markus From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:50:11 +0000 Subject: Re: Hexagon-setup: Combine four seq_printf() calls into one call in show_cpuinfo() Message-Id: <20c77dde-a1a0-8383-f344-a6f788af68d9@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: References: <20161021154624.maiwbgjmzlzhin2l@thunk.org> <48d54097-6be3-d39d-2af9-d4ad90c3c417@users.sourceforge.net> <20161021175317.nnb2keq7m3phwgbv@thunk.org> In-Reply-To: <20161021175317.nnb2keq7m3phwgbv@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Theodore Ts'o , Julia Lawall Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Richard Kuo , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org > When the author of the semantic patch language is telling you to stand down, The collaboration evolved between Julia and me during the years somehow. Different software development opinions occur then as usual. Further opinions from contributors like you can eventually show variations between disagreement and acceptance. > and you still want to try to argue for blind application of patches, I guess that we have got different views about "blind" tries. > we have a really big problem. I hope that potential communication difficulties can still be resolved. > Especially when some of your patches have actually introduced bugs. I assume that these incidents could be clarified further, couldn't they? Regards, Markus