From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933321AbdCWMYg (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 08:24:36 -0400 Received: from fllnx210.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.17]:62726 "EHLO fllnx210.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751660AbdCWMYe (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 08:24:34 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] serial: Add name field to uart_port To: Andy Shevchenko References: <20170321133636.8814-1-vigneshr@ti.com> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm Mailing List , Jisheng Zhang From: Vignesh R Message-ID: <21173bda-55e5-b9d0-5eb1-335091fbca6a@ti.com> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:52:46 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 23 March 2017 12:16 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Vignesh R wrote: >> This series adds name attribute to uart_port struct inorder to store >> name of the tty port that will help in identify different uart >> instances. >> This patch series is based on discussion here[1]. > > Please, use versioning for the series. This AFAIU should be v3, and > next (which is expecting based on comments) would be v4. The very first patch I submitted was accepted. So I did not make the previous patch as v2 as it was an incremental fix. Since, this series is very different from previous patch, I chose not to label this as v3. Anyways, will make the next version as v4. Thanks for the review! -- Regards Vignesh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vignesh R Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] serial: Add name field to uart_port Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:52:46 +0530 Message-ID: <21173bda-55e5-b9d0-5eb1-335091fbca6a@ti.com> References: <20170321133636.8814-1-vigneshr@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Jisheng Zhang , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , Jiri Slaby , linux-arm Mailing List List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 23 March 2017 12:16 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Vignesh R wrote: >> This series adds name attribute to uart_port struct inorder to store >> name of the tty port that will help in identify different uart >> instances. >> This patch series is based on discussion here[1]. > > Please, use versioning for the series. This AFAIU should be v3, and > next (which is expecting based on comments) would be v4. The very first patch I submitted was accepted. So I did not make the previous patch as v2 as it was an incremental fix. Since, this series is very different from previous patch, I chose not to label this as v3. Anyways, will make the next version as v4. Thanks for the review! -- Regards Vignesh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vigneshr@ti.com (Vignesh R) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:52:46 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] serial: Add name field to uart_port In-Reply-To: References: <20170321133636.8814-1-vigneshr@ti.com> Message-ID: <21173bda-55e5-b9d0-5eb1-335091fbca6a@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 23 March 2017 12:16 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Vignesh R wrote: >> This series adds name attribute to uart_port struct inorder to store >> name of the tty port that will help in identify different uart >> instances. >> This patch series is based on discussion here[1]. > > Please, use versioning for the series. This AFAIU should be v3, and > next (which is expecting based on comments) would be v4. The very first patch I submitted was accepted. So I did not make the previous patch as v2 as it was an incremental fix. Since, this series is very different from previous patch, I chose not to label this as v3. Anyways, will make the next version as v4. Thanks for the review! -- Regards Vignesh