From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] tools/libxl: Allow dom0 to be destroyed Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:08:20 +0100 Message-ID: <21308.10212.595935.671985@mariner.uk.xensource.com> References: <1395921128-7086-1-git-send-email-dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov> <1395921128-7086-8-git-send-email-dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov> <1395934541.22909.157.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1395934541.22909.157.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Daniel De Graaf , Stefano Stabellini , Keir Fraser , Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 7/7] tools/libxl: Allow dom0 to be destroyed"): > On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 07:52 -0400, Daniel De Graaf wrote: > > When dom0 is not the hardware domain, it can be destroyed in the same > > way as any other service domain. To avoid accidental use when a domain > > is not resolved, destroying domain 0 requires passing -f to xl destroy. > > Since the hypervisor already prevents a domain from destroying itself, > > this patch is only useful in a disaggregated environment. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf > > Cc: Ian Jackson > > Cc: Stefano Stabellini > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell > > It looks like Jan or Keir will be committing the majority of this patch, > so I will assume that this will go in at the same time. FWIW Acked-by: Ian Jackson Thanks, Ian.