From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Jackson Subject: Re: [xen-4.4-testing test] 25979: regressions - FAIL Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:10:44 +0100 Message-ID: <21345.4724.771223.556928@mariner.uk.xensource.com> References: <535A646C020000780000C461@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <1398426383.18537.432.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <535A6EDF020000780000C4DB@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WfWA9-00006n-C0 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:11:09 +0000 In-Reply-To: <535A6EDF020000780000C4DB@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 25979: regressions - FAIL"): > On 25.04.14 at 13:46, wrote: > > How long did the fourth boot take in 25794 I wonder? > > 6247s (ran on lace-bug) See my other email. I think this is host-specific. lace-bug is an AMD machine. I think perhaps this is a performance problem with SVM. Ian.