From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Jackson Subject: Re: [Need Input] (informal) Automotive PV drivers subproject request Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 14:12:13 +0100 Message-ID: <21397.45741.953881.375975@mariner.uk.xensource.com> References: <538F2BA7.8060806@xen.org> <1401899758.6866.44.camel@Solace> <1402045192.29759.31.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5391BC9C.40503@xen.org> <1402067321.1313.95.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1402092104.29895.18.camel@Abyss> <5395A7B7.4080203@xen.org> <5395AA78.1080904@xen.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5395AA78.1080904@xen.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: lars.kurth@xen.org Cc: Artem Mygaiev , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , Dario Faggioli , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , David Vrabel , Andrii Tseglytskyi List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Lars Kurth writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [Need Input] (informal) Automotive PV drivers subproject request"): > As an aside, > > it looks to me as if we were close enough to draft a subproject proposal > on the wiki. As far I can see we agreed on > * we need a subproject I would just like to quibble with your pathnames. I think that the subproject should have its own subdirectory, which should contain all of its repos. So: > * we need an official xenbits.org/pvdrivers.git repo; it would also come > with its own mailing list if desired > * in addition we need integration branches for xen.git, linux.git, > pvdrivers.git - it appears that the consensus here is that we use the > same pattern as elsewhere Rather, we should have: xenbits.xen.org/automotive/pvdrivers.git xenbits.xen.org/automotive/linux.git xenbits.xen.org/automotive/xen.git etc. (FSVO "automotive"; I currently have no opinion about the project name.) Cf xenbits.xen.org/xenclient/, xenbits.xen.org/kemari/, xenbits.xen.org/xcp/, xenbits.xen.org/xenrt-citrix/ ... NB these are mostly git url fragments, not http url fragments. So eg "xenbits.xen.org/xenrt-citrix/" contains "xenrt.git" which is accessible via git clone git://xenbits.xen.org/xenrt-citrix/xenrt.git (and also via the gitweb index etc.) If it is helpful there is no technical reason why it would be difficult to provide a subproject with a webtree on xenbits that would be accessible via http://xenbits.xen.org/subproject/. But we don't want xenbits to be used for general-purpose web hosting. AIUI this particular subproject doesn't have a requirement at this stage for a separate web hosting setup. > (aka the location for the staging branch is in xenbits.org/people). > Maybe with some mods, e.g. people/automotive/* instead of people/* - > although this is not yet finally agreed. There are still differing > opinions on naming. I agree with Ian Campbell that we do not want subproject names in people/. That is strictly for human beings, and contains only "unofficial" repos. Thanks, Ian.