From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB29787CE for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 14:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com ([147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id w57EBtWg025463 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:11:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yow-masselst-lx1.localnet (128.224.60.223) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.399.0; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:11:55 -0700 From: Mark Asselstine To: Otavio Salvador Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:11:54 -0400 Message-ID: <2144445.ZD38EH98DM@yow-masselst-lx1> Organization: Wind River In-Reply-To: References: <10630413.xVAl2E7OaH@yow-masselst-lx1> <91e19a88-1a03-b772-b6be-bf6bf27037c8@skidata.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Otavio Salvador , OpenEmbedded Devel List , Mario Domenech Goulart Subject: Re: [meta-java] maintainer status X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 14:12:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Thursday, June 7, 2018 9:56:34 AM EDT Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Richard Leitner > wrote: > .... > > > As I'm using this layer now for quite a few years I'll be glad to help you > > with the maintainership of meta-java. Nonetheless I have to admit that I > > have no experience in maintaining an openembedded layer ;-) > > > > Therefore if you're still interested I'd have some questions regarding the > > "strategic" targets, workflows and stuff like that... > > Awesome, new energy! +1. This is great news, thanks Richard for all your previous work and commits to meta-java and for putting up your hand to help maintain this layer. This is about the best outcome I could have asked for when I started this thread. Thanks everyone, Mark > > Sure, go ahead and ask :-D