From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH SECURITY-POLICY 3/9] Deployment with
	Security Team Permission
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:38:23 +0000
Message-ID: <21693.2255.357567.583370@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References: <21689.27383.339939.319567@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
	<1421437941-10997-1-git-send-email-ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
	<1421437941-10997-3-git-send-email-ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
	<54BCE88302000078000564EE@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<9B322CF6-E14F-4C99-A66E-78A542FB90C2@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>) id 1YDCXC-0005u5-Tk
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:38:27 +0000
In-Reply-To: <9B322CF6-E14F-4C99-A66E-78A542FB90C2@gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Lars Kurth writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH SECURITY-POLICY 3/9] Deployment with Security Team Permission"):
> On 19 Jan 2015, at 10:20, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> > On 16.01.15 at 20:52, <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> >> +<p>List members may, if (and only if) the Security Team grants
> >> +permission, deploy fixed versions during the embargo.  Permission for
> 
> Better: List members may deploy fixed versions during the embargo, if (...)

The reason I didn't write it like that is that someone who reads only
the first part of the sentence might not see the caveat.

Is my wording unclear ?

Ian.