From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sujith Manoharan <sujith@msujith.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 03:51:24 +0530
Subject: [ath9k-devel] AR9103(AR9132) Antenna diversity
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonKBQx2edXYhSywdn9XAkx3SrQzprkK=e9TPWpQxr1A6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <54BFB74F.9060100@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
	<CAJ-Vmo=ExP84qDt4dVDTagD5X2ZHLp7fGO0DXFvvK7xNs30few@mail.gmail.com>
	<54C09EC9.1070906@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
	<CAJ-VmonKBQx2edXYhSywdn9XAkx3SrQzprkK=e9TPWpQxr1A6g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <21697.30692.281113.211113@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

Adrian Chadd wrote:
> It's already doing MIMO diversity. If you have a chainmask that has 2
> or more antennas enabled it already is doing it.
> 
> I think that variable is slow antenna diversity, not MIMO diversity.

It's for LNA diversity - 1x1 chips like AR9485, AR9565 etc.

Sujith