From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s72.web-hosting.com ([198.187.29.22]:60546 "EHLO s72.web-hosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933229AbbA2Bwj (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:52:39 -0500 From: Sujith Manoharan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <21704.57262.573728.929633@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (sfid-20150129_025250_228308_4B94F41E) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:40:06 +0530 To: Kalle Valo Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ath9k: Add a macro to identify PCOEM chips In-Reply-To: <87fvav83jc.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <1421633598-4488-1-git-send-email-sujith@msujith.org> <1421633598-4488-4-git-send-email-sujith@msujith.org> <21704.53700.641822.118302@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87oapj85k8.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <21704.54622.181818.695588@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87fvav83jc.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Kalle Valo wrote: > For ath10k there's currently a separate patchwork project (I haven't > bothered to change that yet), but for all other drivers you should see > the patches from this link: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ > > If the patch is not in the list, it's not commited and there's no clear > reason why it was dropped, the chances are that I did a mistake. Like in > this case and also with one of the mwifiex patch earlier this week. I'll > need to be more careful with the states. Ok, thanks. Sujith