From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Jackson Subject: Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 08/13] Planner: ms-queuedaemon: Prep for multiple walkers Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:42:41 +0100 Message-ID: <21992.27249.872155.847055@mariner.uk.xensource.com> References: <1441208719-31336-1-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> <1441208719-31336-9-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> <1441281920.26292.352.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXWf1-0004Wj-KA for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 15:42:47 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1441281920.26292.352.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 08/13] Planner: ms-queuedaemon: Prep for multiple walkers"): > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 16:45 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > We are going to introduce multiple concurrent streams of planning > > processing, called `walkers'. ... > This mostly seems plausible, in so far as I can speak tcl. Thanks. > You spotted a bug while explaining the intricacies of upvar/uplevel to me > IRL, but I didn't see anything further... Indeed; I have fixed that bug in my tree. Ian.