From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages] [and 1 more messages]
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 16:00:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22089.64906.343969.189469@mariner.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22083.29398.894103.109649@mariner.uk.xensource.com>, <osstest-64287-mainreport@xen.org>
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]"):
> I wonder how easy it would be to filter out the wrong advertisement,
> during outgoing migration, in the toolstack in 4.2. I appreciate that
> 4.2 is long-dead. So maybe we should just leave it. Users can shut
> down and restart their guests.
For now I think the easiest fix is:
osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.3-testing test] 64287: regressions - FAIL"):
> flight 64287 xen-4.3-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64287/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade 21 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 63212
Based on this, which is the only regression in 64287, we could force
push this:
> version targeted for testing:
> xen fd1e4cc4d1d100337931b6f6dc50ed0b9766968a
> baseline version:
> xen 85ca813ec23c5a60680e4a13777dad530065902b
>
> Last test of basis 63212 2015-10-22 10:03:01 Z 24 days
> Failing since 63360 2015-10-29 13:39:04 Z 17 days 12 attempts
> Testing same since 64090 2015-11-10 18:01:42 Z 5 days 3 attempts
Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-16 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-15 23:19 [xen-4.3-testing test] 64287: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2015-11-10 17:59 ` [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: " osstest service owner
2015-11-11 10:58 ` Jan Beulich
2015-11-11 11:25 ` Ian Campbell
2015-11-11 11:35 ` Jan Beulich
2015-11-11 11:51 ` Ian Campbell
2015-11-11 15:30 ` Ian Jackson
2015-11-11 15:34 ` Ian Campbell
2015-11-11 15:58 ` Ian Jackson
2015-11-11 16:17 ` Jan Beulich
2015-11-11 16:54 ` [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2015-11-16 16:00 ` Ian Jackson [this message]
2015-11-16 16:11 ` [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages] " Jan Beulich
2015-11-16 16:14 ` Ian Jackson
2015-11-16 16:24 ` Jan Beulich
2015-11-16 16:55 ` Ian Jackson
2015-11-11 16:21 ` [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: regressions - FAIL Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22089.64906.343969.189469@mariner.uk.xensource.com \
--to=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.