From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Jackson Subject: Re: Stabilising some tools only HVMOPs? Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:28:16 +0000 Message-ID: <22213.61728.672908.181165@mariner.uk.xensource.com> References: <20160217172808.GB3723@citrix.com> <20160218125144.GI3723@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aWRRG-0005m6-3H for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:28:22 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20160218125144.GI3723@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu Cc: Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , Andrew Cooper , Paul Durrant , Jan Beulich , Anthony PERARD , Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Wei Liu writes ("Re: Stabilising some tools only HVMOPs?"): > I think we come to the conclusion that these HVMOPs should be made > stable. And to do so I'm going to introduce a __XEN_TOOLS_STABLE__ macro > for them to distinguish from __XEN_TOOLS__. And then libxendevicemodel > will have -D__XEN_TOOLS_STABLE__ only. > > Does this sound sufficient? It would be better to rename -D__XEN_TOOLS__ too, to -D__XEN_TOOLS_UNSTABLE. Ian.