All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] tools/xenalyze: Fix off-by-one in MAX_CPUS range checks
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:30:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22224.17790.87895.440183@mariner.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456411743-17741-7-git-send-email-george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>

George Dunlap writes ("[PATCH 6/8] tools/xenalyze: Fix off-by-one in MAX_CPUS range checks"):
> Skip action / throw error if cpu/vcpu >= MAX_CPUS  rather than >.
> 
> Also add an assertion to vcpu_find, to make future errors of this kind
> not out-of-bounds.
...
> +    /* "Graceful" handling of vid >= MAX_CPUS should be handled elsewhere */
> +    if ( vid >= MAX_CPUS ) {
> +        fprintf(stderr, "%s: vcpu %d exceeds MAX_CPUS %d!\n",
> +                __func__, vid, MAX_CPUS);
> +        error(ERR_ASSERT, NULL);
> +    }

I'm not convinced by the existence of error(ERR_ASSERT,...).  What is
wrong with assert() ?

If you agree that ERR_ASSERT should be got rid of, then you could
start here...

But:

Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-26 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-25 14:48 [PATCH 0/8] Fixes to Coverity issues reported on xenalyze George Dunlap
2016-02-25 14:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] tools/xenalyze: Close symbol_file after reading it George Dunlap
2016-02-26 12:22   ` Ian Jackson
2016-02-29 16:11     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-25 14:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] tools/xenalyze: Avoid redundant check George Dunlap
2016-02-26 12:23   ` Ian Jackson
2016-02-29 16:15     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-25 14:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] tools/xenalyze: Handle fstat errors properly George Dunlap
2016-02-26 12:25   ` Ian Jackson
2016-03-03 12:28     ` George Dunlap
2016-02-25 14:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] tools/xenalyze: Mark unreachable code as unreachable George Dunlap
2016-02-25 15:03   ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-25 15:09     ` George Dunlap
2016-02-25 15:28       ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-25 15:43         ` George Dunlap
2016-02-25 15:52           ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-26 12:28             ` Ian Jackson
2016-02-25 14:49 ` [PATCH 5/8] tools/xenalyze: Fix check for error return value George Dunlap
2016-02-26 12:29   ` Ian Jackson
2016-02-29 16:16     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-25 14:49 ` [PATCH 6/8] tools/xenalyze: Fix off-by-one in MAX_CPUS range checks George Dunlap
2016-02-26 12:30   ` Ian Jackson [this message]
2016-02-29 16:58     ` George Dunlap
2016-03-03 12:44       ` George Dunlap
2016-02-25 14:49 ` [PATCH 7/8] tools/xenalyze: Fix multiple instances of *HYPERCALL_MAX George Dunlap
2016-02-26 12:33   ` Ian Jackson
2016-02-29 17:29     ` George Dunlap
2016-03-01 13:36       ` Ian Jackson
2016-02-25 14:49 ` [PATCH 8/8] tools/xenalyze: Actually handle case where number of ipi vectors exceeds static max George Dunlap
2016-02-26 12:34   ` Ian Jackson
2016-02-29 16:16     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=22224.17790.87895.440183@mariner.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.