From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: elena.reshetova@intel.com (Reshetova, Elena) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 07:22:17 +0000 Subject: [Cocci] Coccinelle: add atomic_as_refcounter script In-Reply-To: References: <1502884342-10702-2-git-send-email-elena.reshetova@intel.com> Message-ID: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B6FF489CB@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr > Dear Elena, Hi Markus! > > Why do you insist to use the variables ?fname2? till ?fname6? in > this evolving SmPL script (instead of merging them into a single one > with a special constraint)? I am pretty new to Coccinelle and Julia has recommended against this approach, so I was merely following her advice. I really do not understand the implications of the change as well as she does. Your approach would certainly look prettier script-wise, but I don't want to cause any undesirable side-effects. > > How do you think about to omit the cover letter for the addition > of such a script (when the change log can be integrated into > the same message for your update suggestion)? Sorry, not sure I understood this. Could you please explain more? > > Regards, > Markus