All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>
To: "Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Cc: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
	'Linux Netdev List' <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	e1000-devel <e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: RE: [bisected regression] e1000e: "Detected Hardware Unit Hang"
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:00:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2239047.Ns2P95dsQ1@storm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <309B89C4C689E141A5FF6A0C5FB2118B78D8BD39@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>

Hi Aaron,

On Monday, 23. March 2015 22:37:08 Brown, Aaron F wrote:
> > >
> > > And with an internal reproduction of the issue I have created an
> > 
> > internal
> > 
> > > bug report, described my set of reproductions, referenced the similar
> > > external ones and assigned it to our current e1000e developer.
> > 
> > 
> > just wanted to quickly check if there has been any progress
> > since the internal bug report has been filed?
> 
> 
> No, no updates beyond a bit of investigation.

any news on this from the Intel labs?

Another two months passed ;) It would be nice to get rid
of the workaround that limits the max fragment size to 4096.

Thanks,
Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-27 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-14 15:32 [bisected regression] e1000e: "Detected Hardware Unit Hang" Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-14 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 10:11   ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 14:43     ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 14:58       ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 15:25         ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 15:48           ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 16:00             ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 17:04               ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 17:20                 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 17:37                   ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 18:24                     ` Re: Re: Re: " Eric Dumazet
2015-01-19 16:49           ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 14:59       ` Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-11 11:23         ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-02-11 11:34           ` Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-12 23:28             ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-02-13 16:14               ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-02-21  1:59                 ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-03-23 13:58                   ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-03-23 22:37                     ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-05-27 16:00                       ` Thomas Jarosch [this message]
2015-05-30  1:18                         ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-07-29  8:51                           ` Thomas Jarosch
2019-05-02 12:58                             ` Juliana Rodrigueiro
2015-02-12  1:18           ` nick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2239047.Ns2P95dsQ1@storm \
    --to=thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com \
    --cc=aaron.f.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.