All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: Doug Smythies <doug.smythies@gmail.com>,
	rafael@kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com
Cc: dsmythies@telus.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Override parameters if HWP forced by BIOS
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 23:33:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <223a72d91cfda9b13230e4f8cd6a29f853535277.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210909034802.1708-1-dsmythies@telus.net>

On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 20:48 -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
> If HWP has been already been enabled by BIOS, it may be
> necessary to override some kernel command line parameters.
> Once it has been enabled it requires a reset to be disabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index bb4549959b11..073bae5d4498 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -3267,7 +3267,7 @@ static int __init intel_pstate_init(void)
>                  */
>                 if ((!no_hwp && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP)) ||
>                     intel_pstate_hwp_is_enabled()) {
> -                       hwp_active++;
> +                       hwp_active = 1;
Why this change?

>                         hwp_mode_bdw = id->driver_data;
>                         intel_pstate.attr = hwp_cpufreq_attrs;
>                         intel_cpufreq.attr = hwp_cpufreq_attrs;
> @@ -3347,17 +3347,27 @@ device_initcall(intel_pstate_init);
>  
>  static int __init intel_pstate_setup(char *str)
>  {
> +       /*
> +        * If BIOS is forcing HWP, then parameter
> +        * overrides might be needed. Only print
> +        * the message once, and regardless of
> +        * any overrides.
> +        */
> +       if(!hwp_active 
This part of code is from early_param, Is it possible that 
hwp_active is not 0?

> && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP))
> +               if(intel_pstate_hwp_is_enabled()){
> +                       pr_info("HWP enabled by BIOS\n");
> +                       hwp_active = 1;
> +               }
>         if (!str)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>  
> -       if (!strcmp(str, "disable"))
> +       if (!strcmp(str, "disable") && !hwp_active)
>                 no_load = 1; 
> -       else if (!strcmp(str, "active"))
> +       if (!strcmp(str, "active"))
>                 default_driver = &intel_pstate;
> -       else if (!strcmp(str, "passive"))
> +       if (!strcmp(str, "passive"))
>                 default_driver = &intel_cpufreq;

Why "else if" changed to "if" ?


Thanks,
Srinivas

> -
> -       if (!strcmp(str, "no_hwp")) {
> +       if (!strcmp(str, "no_hwp") && !hwp_active) {
>                 pr_info("HWP disabled\n");
>                 no_hwp = 1;
>         }



  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-09  6:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-09  3:48 [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Override parameters if HWP forced by BIOS Doug Smythies
2021-09-09  6:33 ` Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2021-09-09 11:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-09 13:20     ` Doug Smythies
2021-09-09 16:12       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-09 17:22         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-10  3:14           ` Doug Smythies
2021-09-10 11:18             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-10 15:34               ` Doug Smythies
2021-09-10 15:45                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-09 13:30   ` Doug Smythies
2021-09-09 14:52     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2021-09-10  4:11       ` Doug Smythies

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=223a72d91cfda9b13230e4f8cd6a29f853535277.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=doug.smythies@gmail.com \
    --cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.