From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Maloney Subject: Re: removing cluster name support Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 15:41:34 +0200 Message-ID: <224421e8-759c-4e78-8ac1-4547d8ee3553@brockmann-consult.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ceph-users-bounces-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org Sender: "ceph-users" To: Sage Weil , ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ceph-users-Qp0mS5GaXlQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org On 06/08/17 21:37, Sage Weil wrote: > Questions: > > - Does anybody on the list use a non-default cluster name? > - If so, do you have a reason not to switch back to 'ceph'? > > Thanks! > sage Will it still be possible for clients to use multiple clusters? Also how does this affect rbd mirroring?