From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752591AbbH1Nin (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:38:43 -0400 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:59620 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752176AbbH1Nim (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:38:42 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Pi-Cheng Chen Cc: Viresh Kumar , Matthias Brugger , Mark Rutland , Michael Turquette , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linaro Kernel Mailman List , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v6] Add Mediatek MT8173 cpufreq driver Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:06:16 +0200 Message-ID: <22538895.vrRgZUmQTV@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/4.1.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1439803465-19683-1-git-send-email-pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org> <20150826021659.GD8784@linux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 02:53:39 PM Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 26-08-15, 09:25, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: > >> The [3/3] is based on Mediatek SoC maintainer tree[1] and the patch which > >> introduce a new clock type[2] consumed by MT8173 cpufreq driver. So it will > >> cause some conflicts if it goes through your tree. I am not sure how this > >> should be handled, but should it be merged through Mediatek SoC maintainer > >> tree? > > > > Just get that applied to MTK tree, it doesn't have any dependency on > > rest of the patches for build/boot. The only thing is that cpufreq > > wouldn't work and it will work as soon as Rafael's and MTK's trees are > > merged by Linus. > > Thanks for your explanation. > > @Rafael, Would you please apply [1,2] to your tree? Applied, thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v6] Add Mediatek MT8173 cpufreq driver Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:06:16 +0200 Message-ID: <22538895.vrRgZUmQTV@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1439803465-19683-1-git-send-email-pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org> <20150826021659.GD8784@linux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pi-Cheng Chen Cc: Viresh Kumar , Matthias Brugger , Mark Rutland , Michael Turquette , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linaro Kernel Mailman List , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 02:53:39 PM Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 26-08-15, 09:25, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: > >> The [3/3] is based on Mediatek SoC maintainer tree[1] and the patch which > >> introduce a new clock type[2] consumed by MT8173 cpufreq driver. So it will > >> cause some conflicts if it goes through your tree. I am not sure how this > >> should be handled, but should it be merged through Mediatek SoC maintainer > >> tree? > > > > Just get that applied to MTK tree, it doesn't have any dependency on > > rest of the patches for build/boot. The only thing is that cpufreq > > wouldn't work and it will work as soon as Rafael's and MTK's trees are > > merged by Linus. > > Thanks for your explanation. > > @Rafael, Would you please apply [1,2] to your tree? Applied, thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rjw@rjwysocki.net (Rafael J. Wysocki) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:06:16 +0200 Subject: [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v6] Add Mediatek MT8173 cpufreq driver In-Reply-To: References: <1439803465-19683-1-git-send-email-pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org> <20150826021659.GD8784@linux> Message-ID: <22538895.vrRgZUmQTV@vostro.rjw.lan> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 02:53:39 PM Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 26-08-15, 09:25, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: > >> The [3/3] is based on Mediatek SoC maintainer tree[1] and the patch which > >> introduce a new clock type[2] consumed by MT8173 cpufreq driver. So it will > >> cause some conflicts if it goes through your tree. I am not sure how this > >> should be handled, but should it be merged through Mediatek SoC maintainer > >> tree? > > > > Just get that applied to MTK tree, it doesn't have any dependency on > > rest of the patches for build/boot. The only thing is that cpufreq > > wouldn't work and it will work as soon as Rafael's and MTK's trees are > > merged by Linus. > > Thanks for your explanation. > > @Rafael, Would you please apply [1,2] to your tree? Applied, thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.