From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 34/48] acpi: Register power-off handler with kernel power-off handler Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 23:32:26 +0100 Message-ID: <2274417.WekTW87bGm@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1415292213-28652-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <1415292213-28652-35-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1415292213-28652-35-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, November 06, 2014 08:43:18 AM Guenter Roeck wrote: > Register with kernel power-off handler instead of setting pm_power_off > directly. Register with high priority to reflect that the driver explicitly > overrides existing power-off handlers. > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki > Cc: Len Brown > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck That's fine by me. Rafael > --- > v5: > - Rebase to v3.18-rc3 > v4: > - Do not use notifiers but internal functions and data structures to manage > the list of power-off handlers. Drop unused parameters from callbacks, and > make the power-off function type void > v3: > - Replace poweroff in all newly introduced variables and in text > with power_off or power-off as appropriate > - Replace POWEROFF_PRIORITY_xxx with POWER_OFF_PRIORITY_xxx > - Replace acpi: with ACPI: in log message > v2: > - Use define to specify poweroff handler priority > - Use pr_warn instead of pr_err > > drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c > index 05a31b5..a73cfad 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -827,7 +828,7 @@ static void acpi_power_off_prepare(void) > acpi_disable_all_gpes(); > } > > -static void acpi_power_off(void) > +static void acpi_power_off(struct power_off_handler_block *this) > { > /* acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S5) should have already been called */ > printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s called\n", __func__); > @@ -835,6 +836,11 @@ static void acpi_power_off(void) > acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S5); > } > > +static struct power_off_handler_block acpi_power_off_hb = { > + .handler = acpi_power_off, > + .priority = POWER_OFF_PRIORITY_HIGH, > +}; > + > int __init acpi_sleep_init(void) > { > char supported[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT * 3 + 1]; > @@ -851,7 +857,8 @@ int __init acpi_sleep_init(void) > if (acpi_sleep_state_supported(ACPI_STATE_S5)) { > sleep_states[ACPI_STATE_S5] = 1; > pm_power_off_prepare = acpi_power_off_prepare; > - pm_power_off = acpi_power_off; > + if (register_power_off_handler(&acpi_power_off_hb)) > + pr_warn("ACPI: Failed to register power-off handler\n"); > } > > supported[0] = 0; > -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.